Randomized multicenter trial of sentinel node biopsy versus standard axillary treatment in operable breast cancer: The ALMANAC trial

被引:1227
作者
Mansel, RE [1 ]
Fallowfield, L
Kissin, M
Goyal, A
Newcombe, RG
Dixon, JM
Yiangou, C
Horgan, K
Bundred, N
Monypenny, I
England, D
Sibbering, M
Abdullah, TJ
Barr, L
Chetty, U
Sinnett, DH
Fleissig, A
Clarke, D
Ell, PJ
机构
[1] Univ Cardiff Wales, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Cardiff CF14 4XN, Wales
[2] Brighton & Sussx Med Sch, Canc Res UK Psychosocial Oncol Grp, Falmer, England
[3] Royal Sussex Cty Hosp, Dept Surg, Guildford, Surrey, England
[4] Univ Cardiff Wales, Dept Epidemiol Stat & Publ Hlth, Cardiff, Wales
[5] Western Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Midlothian, Scotland
[6] Queen Alexandra Hosp, Dept Surg, Portsmouth, Hants, England
[7] Leeds Gen Infirm, Dept Surg, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[8] Univ S Manchester Hosp, Dept Surg, Manchester M20 8LR, Lancs, England
[9] Queen Elizabeth Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[10] Derby City Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Derby, England
[11] Edith Cavell Hosp, Dept Surg, Peterborough, England
[12] Charing Cross Hosp, Dept Surg, London, England
[13] Middlesex Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, London, England
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djj158
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy in women with operable breast cancer is routinely used in some countries for staging the axilla despite limited data from randomized trials on morbidity and mortality outcomes. We conducted a multicenter randomized trial to compare quality-of-life outcomes between patients with clinically node-negative invasive breast cancer who received sentinel lymph node biopsy and patients who received standard axillary treatment. Methods: The primary outcome measures were arm and shoulder morbidity and quality of life. From November 1999 to October 2003 1031 patients were randomly assigned to undergo sentinel lymph node biopsy (n = 515) or standard axillary surgery (n = 516). Patients with sentinel lymph node metastases proceeded to delayed axillary clearance or received axillary radiotherapy (depending on the protocol at the treating institution). Intention-to-treat analyses of data at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery are presented. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: The relative risks of any lymphedema and sensory loss for the sentinel lymph node biopsy group compared with the standard axillary treatment group at 12 months were 0.37 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.23 to 0.60; absolute rates: 5% versus 13%) and 0.37 (95% Cl = 0.27 to 0.50, absolute rates: 11% versus 31%), respectively. Drain usage, length of hospital stay, and time to resumption of normal day-to-day activities after surgery were statistically significantly lower in the sentinel lymph node biopsy group (all P <.001), and axillary operative time was reduced (P =.055). Overall patient-recorded quality of life and arm functioning scores were statistically significantly better in the sentinel lymph node biopsy group throughout (all P <=.003). These benefits were seen with no increase in anxiety levels in the sentinel lymph node biopsy group (P >.05). Conclusion: Sentinel lymph node biopsy is associated with reduced arm morbidity and better quality of life than standard axillary treatment and should be the treatment of choice for patients who have early-stage breast cancer with clinically negative nodes.
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 609
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [21] Defining the optimal surgeon experience for breast cancer sentinel lymph node biopsy: A model for implementation of new surgical techniques
    McMasters, KM
    Wong, SL
    Chao, C
    Woo, C
    Tuttle, TM
    Noyes, RD
    Carlson, DJ
    Laidley, AL
    McGlothin, TQ
    Ley, PB
    Brown, CM
    Glaser, RL
    Pennington, RE
    Turk, PS
    Simpson, D
    Edwards, MJ
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2001, 234 (03) : 292 - 299
  • [22] COMPARATIVE-ANALYSIS OF 2 RATES
    MIETTINEN, O
    NURMINEN, M
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1985, 4 (02) : 213 - 226
  • [23] The risk of axillary relapse after sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer is comparable with that of axillary lymph node dissection - A follow-up study of 4008 procedures
    Naik, AM
    Fey, J
    Gemignani, M
    Heerdt, A
    Montgomery, L
    Petrek, J
    Port, E
    Sacchini, V
    Sclafani, L
    VanZee, K
    Wagman, R
    Borgen, PI
    Cody, HS
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (03) : 462 - 468
  • [24] Newcombe RG, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P873, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<873::AID-SIM779>3.0.CO
  • [25] 2-I
  • [26] Comparison of quality of life and arm complaints after axillary lymph node dissection vs sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients
    Peintinger, F
    Reitsamer, R
    Stranzl, H
    Ralph, G
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 89 (04) : 648 - 652
  • [27] Morbidity after sentinel lymph node biopsy in primary breast cancer: Results from a randomized controlled trial
    Purushotham, AD
    Upponi, S
    Klevesath, MB
    Bobrow, L
    Millar, K
    Myles, JP
    Duffy, SW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (19) : 4312 - 4321
  • [28] Complications of level I and II axillary dissection in the treatment of carcinoma of the breast
    Roses, DF
    Brooks, AD
    Harris, MN
    Shapiro, RL
    Mitnick, J
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1999, 230 (02) : 194 - 201
  • [29] Schrenk P, 2000, CANCER, V88, P608, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000201)88:3<608::AID-CNCR17>3.0.CO
  • [30] 2-K