The importance of imports for household environmental impacts

被引:103
作者
Peters, Glen P. [1 ]
Hertwich, Edgar G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Ind Ecol Programme, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
carbon dioxide (CO2); input-output analysis (IOA); nitrogen oxides (NOx); sulfur dioxide (SO2); consumption structural path analysis;
D O I
10.1162/jiec.2006.10.3.89
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A promising way to reduce environmental impacts of consumer expenditure is through the encouragement of more sustainable consumption patterns. Consumers cause environmental impacts both directly, such as by fuel use in personal cars, and indirectly, by paying for the production of consumables. With increased international trade, the indirect environmental impacts are difficult to determine because a portion of the emissions occurs in different geographical regions. Many previous studies have unrealistically assumed that imports are produced using domestic production technology. For countries with diverging technology and energy mixes the likely errors are significant. This study applies a methodology that explicitly includes technology differences to the case of Norwegian households. It is found that a significant portion of pollution is embodied in Norwegian household imports. Further, a disproportionately large amount of pollution is embodied in imports from developing countries. Overall, as in previous studies, we find that mobility and food are most important in terms of household environmental impacts. By analyzing the imports in more detail we find that for some sectors the majority of emissions occur in foreign regions; in particular, this is true for food, business services, clothing, chemicals, furniture, cars, agriculture, textiles, and most manufactured products.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 109
页数:21
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [11] *EUR, 2005, RAMON EUR CLASS SERV
  • [12] *EUR, 2005, EUR STAT OFF EUR COM
  • [13] Transport and Environment Database System (TRENDS): Maritime air pollutant emission modelling
    Georgakaki, A
    Coffey, RA
    Lock, G
    Sorenson, SC
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 39 (13) : 2357 - 2365
  • [14] Herendeen R., 1976, Energy, V1, P165, DOI [10.1016/0360-5442(76)90015-3, DOI 10.1016/0360-5442(76)90015-3]
  • [15] Life cycle approaches to sustainable consumption: A critical review
    Hertwich, EG
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 39 (13) : 4673 - 4684
  • [16] HERTWICH EG, 2002, LIF CYCL APPR SUST C
  • [17] HUBACEK K, 2002, UNPUB EMISSION INTEN
  • [18] Live better by consuming less? Is there a "double dividend" in sustainable consumption?
    Jackson, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2005, 9 (1-2) : 19 - 36
  • [19] Jackson T., 2004, Energy Environment, V15, P1027, DOI [DOI 10.1260/0958305043026573, 10.1260/0958305043026573]
  • [20] A comparative multivariate analysis of household energy requirements in Australia, Brazil, Denmark, India and Japan
    Lenzen, M
    Wier, M
    Cohen, C
    Hayami, H
    Pachauri, S
    Schaeffer, R
    [J]. ENERGY, 2006, 31 (2-3) : 181 - 207