The root of the angiosperms revisited

被引:228
作者
Zanis, MJ [1 ]
Soltis, DE
Soltis, PS
Mathews, S
Donoghue, MJ
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Sch Biol Sci, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Bot, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[3] Univ Florida, Genet Inst, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[4] Univ Florida, Florida Museum Nat Hist, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[5] Univ Missouri, Div Biol Sci, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[6] Yale Univ, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1073/pnas.092136399
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Most recent phylogenetic analyses of basal angiosperms have converged on the placement of Amborella as sister to all other extant angiosperms. However, certain recent studies suggest that Amborella and Nymphaeales (water lilies) form a clade sister to all remaining angiosperms or that Nymphaeales alone are the sister to the remaining angiosperms. We report here (i) maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses of 11 genes (>15,000 bp per taxon) for 16 taxa, (ii) maximum parsimony analysis for a subset of these genes for 104 taxa, and (iii) tests of alternative rootings with the nonparametric bootstrap and the likelihood ratio test with the parametric bootstrap. In addition, we use simulation analyses to examine the amount of bias that may be present in our methods of phylogeny estimation. Amborella continues to receive strong bootstrap support as the sister to all other extant angiosperms, and three of four tests reject alternative hypotheses of the angiosperm root. Although we cannot conclusively choose between Amborella vs. Amborella + Nymphaeales as sister to all other angiosperms, most analyses favor the former rooting.
引用
收藏
页码:6848 / 6853
页数:6
相关论文
共 49 条
[11]  
FRIIS EM, 1994, PL SYST EVOL S, V8, P31
[12]   Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics [J].
Goldman, N ;
Anderson, JP ;
Rodrigo, AG .
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 2000, 49 (04) :652-670
[13]   Utility of 17 chloroplast genes for inferring the phylogeny of the basal angiosperms [J].
Graham, SW ;
Olmstead, RG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2000, 87 (11) :1712-1730
[14]   Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem? [J].
Graybeal, A .
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 1998, 47 (01) :9-17
[15]  
Hillis D.M., 1990, MOL SYSTEMATICS
[16]   Inferring complex phylogenies [J].
Hillis, DM .
NATURE, 1996, 383 (6596) :130-131
[17]  
Huelsenbeck John P., 1996, P19
[18]  
Huelsenbeck JP, 1998, SYST BIOL, V47, P519
[19]   A likelihood-ratio test of monophyly [J].
Huelsenbeck, JP ;
Hillis, DM ;
Nielsen, R .
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 1996, 45 (04) :546-558
[20]  
HUELSENBECK JP, 2000, MRBAYES 1 10 BAYESIA