Biocompatibility of two commercial forms of mineral trioxide aggregate

被引:132
作者
Camilleri, J
Montesin, FE
Papaioannou, S
McDonald, F
Ford, TRP
机构
[1] Univ London Kings Coll, Guys Kings & St Thomas Dent Inst, Dept Conservat Dent, London WC2R 2LS, England
[2] Univ London Kings Coll, Guys Kings & St Thomas Dent Inst, Dept Orthodont, London WC2R 2LS, England
[3] Univ Malta, Fac Architecture & Civil Engn, Msida, Malta
关键词
biocompatibility; mineral trioxide aggregate; cell culture; scanning electron microscopy; critical-point drying;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00859.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim To examine the biocompatibility of two commercial forms of mineral trioxide aggregate (NITA), by evaluating the morphology of an established cell line. Methodology The two cements were cast on glass cover slips and cured for 1 or 28 days. Saos-2 osteosarcoma cells were trypsinized and seeded at a density of I x 105 cells and were then placed in medium over the material-coated coverslips for 1, 5 and 7 days. After these time intervals the media were discarded and the cells fixed. Cell morphological investigation was performed by scanning electron microscopy at various magnifications ranging from x 250 to X 500. The biocompatibility of cement constituents, alusilicate flux and bismuth oxide was also investigated. Results All cement samples cured for I day showed a confluent cell monolayer after 5 and 7 days. The response to both materials was similar. Materials cured for 28 days showed incomplete cell confluence after 1 and 5 days. Alusilicate flux and bismuth oxide did not demonstrate biocompatibility. Conclusions The I-day cured samples of two commercial forms of NITA showed good biocompatibility. However, the 28-day cured samples were less biocompatible after 1and 5 days.
引用
收藏
页码:699 / 704
页数:6
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   An evaluation of accelerated Portland cement as a restorative material [J].
Abdullah, D ;
Ford, TRP ;
Papaioannou, S ;
Nicholson, J ;
McDonald, F .
BIOMATERIALS, 2002, 23 (19) :4001-4010
[2]  
CAMILLERI J, 2004, IN PRESS DENT MAT
[3]  
GLASSER FP, 1983, STRUCTURE PERFORMANC, P104
[4]   Cellular response to Mineral Trioxide Aggregate [J].
Koh, ET ;
McDonald, F ;
Ford, TRP ;
Torabinejad, M .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1998, 24 (08) :543-547
[5]  
Koh ET, 1997, J BIOMED MATER RES, V37, P432, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19971205)37:3<432::AID-JBM14>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-D
[7]  
LEA FM, 1970, CHEM CEMENT CONCRETE, P252
[8]   Osteoblast biocompatibility of mineral trioxide aggregate [J].
Mitchell, PJC ;
Ford, TRP ;
Torabinejad, M ;
McDonald, F .
BIOMATERIALS, 1999, 20 (02) :167-173
[9]   Osteoblasts and MG-63 osteosarcoma cells behave differently when in contact with ProRoot™ MTA and White MTA [J].
Pérez, AL ;
Spears, R ;
Gutmann, JL ;
Opperman, LA .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2003, 36 (08) :564-570
[10]   Histologic assessment of mineral trioxide aggregate as a root-end filling in monkeys [J].
Torabinejad, M ;
Ford, TRP ;
McKendry, DJ ;
Abedi, HR ;
Miller, DA ;
Kariyawasam, SP .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1997, 23 (04) :225-228