Psychometrics is datametrics:: The test is not reliable

被引：192

作者：

Thompson, B ^{[1
]}

Vacha-Haase, T

机构：

[1] Texas A&M Univ, College Stn, TX 77843 USA

[2] Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA

[3] Colorado State Univ, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA

来源：

EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT | 2000年 / 60卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1177/0013164400602002

中图分类号：

G44 [教育心理学];

学科分类号：

0402 ; 040202 ;

摘要：

The present article responds to selected criticisms of some EPM editorial policies and Vacha-Haase's "reliability generalization" mete-analytic methods. However, the treatment is more broadly a manifesto regarding the nature of score reliability and what are reasonable expectations for psychometric reporting practices in substantive inquiries. The consequences of misunderstandings of score reliability are explored. It is suggested that paradigmatic misconceptions regarding psychometric issues feed into a spiral of presumptions that measurement training is unnecessary for doctoral students, which then in turn further reinforces misunderstandings of score integrity issues.

引用

页码：174 / 195

页数：22

共 59 条

[31] TESTS OF THE SAME LENGTH DO HAVE THE SAME STANDARD ERROR OF MEASUREMENT [J].