Inventing to prepare for future learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction

被引:414
作者
Schwartz, DL [1 ]
Martin, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Educ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1207/s1532690xci2202_1
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Activities that promote student invention can appear inefficient, because students do not generate canonical solutions, and therefore the students may perform badly on standard assessments. Two studies on teaching descriptive statistics to 9th-grade students examined whether invention activities may prepare students to learn. Study I found that invention activities, when coupled with subsequent learning resources like lectures, led to strong gains in procedural skills, insight into formulas, and abilities to evaluate data from an argument. Additionally, an embedded assessment experiment crossed the factors of instructional method by type of transfer test, with I test including resources for learning and I not. A "tell-and-practice" instructional condition led to the same transfer results as an invention condition when there was no learning resource, but the invention condition did better than the tell-and-practice condition when there was a learning resource. This demonstrates the value of invention activities for future learning from resources, and the value of assessments that include opportunities to learn during a test. In Study 2, classroom teachers implemented the instruction and replicated the results. The studies demonstrate that intuitively compelling student-centered activities can be both pedagogically tractable and effective at preparing students to learn.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 184
页数:56
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
ANDERSON JR, 1989, COGNITIVE SCI, V13, P467, DOI 10.1207/s15516709cog1304_1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, CONSTRUCTIVISM MODEL, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781410607713
[3]  
[Anonymous], CLASSROOM LESSONS IN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1997, JASP PROJ LESS CURR
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Principles and standards for school mathematics
[6]  
[Anonymous], ED RES
[7]   Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning [J].
Barron, BJS ;
Schwartz, DL ;
Vye, NJ ;
Moore, A ;
Petrosino, A ;
Zech, L ;
Bransford, JD .
JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 1998, 7 (3-4) :271-311
[8]  
Boaler J., 1997, EXPERIENCING SCH MAT
[9]   NEW APPROACHES TO INSTRUCTION - BECAUSE WISDOM CANT BE TOLD [J].
BRANSFORD, JD ;
FRANKS, JJ ;
VYE, NJ ;
SHERWOOD, RD .
SIMILARITY AND ANALOGICAL REASONING, 1989, :470-497
[10]   Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications [J].
Bransford, JD ;
Schwartz, DL .
REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATION, 24 1999, 1999, 24 :61-100