Azimilide vs. placebo and sotalol for persistent atrial fibrillation:: the A-COMET-II (Azimilide-CardiOversion MaintEnance Trial-II) trial

被引:38
作者
Lombardi, Federico
Borggrefe, Martin
Ruzyllo, Witold
Luederitz, Berndt
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Osped San Paolo, Dept Med Chirurg & Odontoiatria, I-20142 Milan, Italy
[2] Mannheim Univ Heidelberg, Fak Klinn Med, Univ Klinikum, Med Klin 1, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Univ Bonn, Dept Med Cardiol, D-5300 Bonn, Germany
[4] Inst Cardiol, Warsaw, Poland
关键词
anti-arrhythmic drugs; atrial fibrillation; torsade de pointes; long QT;
D O I
10.1093/eurheartj/ehl209
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims Treatment of atrial fibrillation remains a major clinical challenge owing to the limited efficacy and safety of anti-arrhythmic drugs, particularly in patients with structural heart disease. Methods and results To evaluate the efficacy of azimilide, a new class III anti-arrhythmic drug, we studied 658 patients with symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation, adequate anticoagulant therapy, and planned electrical cardioversion. Patients were randomized to placebo, azimilide (125 mg o.d.), or sotalol (160 mg b.i.d.). Primary efficacy analysis was based on event recurrence, which was defined as atrial fibrillation lasting > 24 h, or requiring DC cardioversion. Median time to recurrence was 14 days for azimilide, 12 days for placebo, and 28 days for sotalol (P=0.0320 when comparing azimilide with placebo; P=0.0002 when comparing azimilide with sotalol). The placebo-to-azimilide hazard ratio was 1.291 (95% CI: 1.022-1.629) and the sotalol-to-azimilide hazard ratio was 0.652 (95% CI: 0.523-0.814). Adverse events causing patient withdrawal were more frequent (P < 0.01) in patients on azimilide (12.3%) and on sotalol (13.9%) than on placebo (5.4%). Eight patients in the sotalol (3.5%) and 16 in the azimilide (7.6%) group interrupted the study because of QTc prolongation. Torsade de pointes was reported in five patients of the azimilide group. The percentage of patients who completed the 26 week study period without events were 19% for azimilide, 15% for placebo, and 33% for sotalol (P < 0.01). Unsuccessful day 4 cardioversion, arrhythmia recurrence, and adverse events were the main causes of withdrawal from the study. Conclusion This study demonstrates that the anti-arrhythmic efficacy of azimilide is slightly superior to placebo but significantly inferior to sotalol in patients with persistent AF. The modest anti-arrhythmic efficacy and high rate of torsade de pointes and marked QTc prolongation limit azimilide utilization for the treatment of AF.
引用
收藏
页码:2224 / 2231
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   MULTIPLE TESTING IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
BAUER, P .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1991, 10 (06) :871-890
[2]   Maintenance of sinus rhythm with oral d,I-sotalol therapy in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation and/or atrial flutter [J].
Benditt, DG ;
Williams, JH ;
Jin, J ;
Deering, TF ;
Zucker, R ;
Browne, K ;
Chang-Sing, P ;
Singh, BN .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 84 (03) :270-277
[3]   Mortality in patients after a recent myocardial infarction - A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of azimilide using heart rate variability for risk stratification [J].
Camm, AJ ;
Pratt, CM ;
Schwartz, PJ ;
Al-Khalidi, HR ;
Spyt, MJ ;
Holroyde, MJ ;
Karam, R ;
Sonnenblick, EH ;
Brum, JMG .
CIRCULATION, 2004, 109 (08) :990-996
[4]   Randomized trial of rate-control versus rhythm-control in persistent atrial fibrillation - The Strategies of Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (STAF) study [J].
Carlsson, J ;
Miketic, S ;
Windeler, J ;
Cuneo, A ;
Haun, S ;
Micus, S ;
Walter, S ;
Tebbe, U .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (10) :1690-1696
[5]   Epidemiology and natural history of atrial fibrillation: Clinical implications [J].
Chugh, SS ;
Blackshear, JL ;
Shen, WK ;
Hammill, SC ;
Gersh, BJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 37 (02) :371-378
[6]   Dose-response relations of azimilide in the management of symptomatic, recurrent, atrial fibrillation [J].
Connolly, SJ ;
Schnell, DJ ;
Page, RL ;
Wilkinson, WE ;
Marcello, SR ;
Pritchett, ELC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 88 (09) :974-979
[7]  
Davies MP, 1996, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V276, P1149
[8]  
Dorian Paul, 2002, Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, V7, P211, DOI 10.1177/107424840200700403
[9]   ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation:: Executive summary -: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines and Policy Conferences (Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) [J].
Fuster, V ;
Rydén, LE ;
Asinger, RW ;
Cannom, DS ;
Crijns, HJ ;
Frye, RL ;
Halperin, JL ;
Kay, GN ;
Klein, WW ;
Lévy, S ;
McNamara, RL ;
Prystowsky, EN ;
Wann, LS ;
Wyse, DG ;
Gibbons, RJ ;
Antman, EM ;
Alpert, JS ;
Faxon, DP ;
Fuster, V ;
Gregoratos, G ;
Hiratzka, LF ;
Jacobs, AK ;
Russell, RO ;
Smith, SC ;
Klein, WW ;
Alonso-Garcia, A ;
Blomström-Lundqvist, C ;
De Backer, G ;
Flather, M ;
Hradec, J ;
Oto, A ;
Parkhomenko, A ;
Silber, S ;
Torbicki, A .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 38 (04) :1231-1265
[10]   Rhythm or rate control in atrial fibrillation - Pharmacological intervention in atrial fibrillation (PIAF): a randomised trial [J].
Hohnloser, SH ;
Kuck, KH ;
Lilienthal, J .
LANCET, 2000, 356 (9244) :1789-1794