Process mining techniques for analysing patterns and strategies in students' self-regulated learning

被引:220
作者
Bannert, Maria [1 ]
Reimann, Peter [2 ]
Sonnenberg, Christoph [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wurzburg, D-97074 Wurzburg, Germany
[2] Univ Sydney, Ctr Res Comp Supported Learning & Cognit, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
Self-regulated learning; Temporal patterns in SRL; Process mining; Fuzzy Miner; COLLABORATION; METACOGNITION;
D O I
10.1007/s11409-013-9107-6
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Referring to current research on self-regulated learning, we analyse individual regulation in terms of a set of specific sequences of regulatory activities. Successful students perform regulatory activities such as analysing, planning, monitoring and evaluating cognitive and motivational aspects during learning not only with a higher frequency than less successful learners, but also in a different order-or so we hypothesize. Whereas most research has concentrated on frequency analysis, so far, little is known about how students' regulatory activities unfold over time. Thus, the aim of our approach is to also analyse the temporal order of spontaneous individual regulation activities. In this paper, we demonstrate how various methods developed in process mining research can be applied to identify process patterns in self-regulated learning events as captured in verbal protocols. We also show how theoretical SRL process models can be tested with process mining methods. Thinking aloud data from a study with 38 participants learning in a self-regulated manner from a hypermedia are used to illustrate the methodological points.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 185
页数:25
相关论文
共 63 条
[31]   Collaboration scripts - A conceptual analysis [J].
Kollar, Ingo ;
Fischer, Frank ;
Hesse, Friedrich W. .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2006, 18 (02) :159-185
[32]   The practitioner's guide to coloured Petri nets [J].
Kristensen L.M. ;
Christensen S. ;
Jensen K. .
International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 1998, 2 (2) :98-132
[33]   Supporting collaboration with technology: does shared cognition lead to co-regulation in medicine? [J].
Lajoie, Susanne P. ;
Lu, Jingyan .
METACOGNITION AND LEARNING, 2012, 7 (01) :45-62
[34]   Strategies for theorizing from process data [J].
Langley, A .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1999, 24 (04) :691-710
[35]  
Luckin R, 2013, HANDBOOK OF DESIGN IN EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, P1
[36]  
Manlove S., 2007, Metacognition and Learning, V2, P141, DOI [10.1007/s11409-007-9012-y, DOI 10.1007/S11409-007-9012-Y]
[37]   QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING .1. OUTCOME AND PROCESS [J].
MARTON, F ;
SALJO, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1976, 46 (FEB) :4-11
[38]  
Mohr L. B., 1982, Explaining organizational behavior
[39]   Self-efficacy and prior domain knowledge: to what extent does monitoring mediate their relationship with hypermedia learning? [J].
Moos, Daniel C. ;
Azevedo, Roger .
METACOGNITION AND LEARNING, 2009, 4 (03) :197-216
[40]   Clustering and Sequential Pattern Mining of Online Collaborative Learning Data [J].
Perera, Dilhan ;
Kay, Judy ;
Koprinska, Irena ;
Yacef, Kalina ;
Zaiane, Osmar R. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING, 2009, 21 (06) :759-772