Measuring brain variability by extrapolating sparse tensor fields measured on sulcal lines

被引:51
作者
Fillard, Pierre
Arsigny, Vincent
Pennec, Xavier
Hayashi, Kiralee M.
Thompson, Paul M.
Ayache, Nicholas
机构
[1] INRIA Sophia Antipolis, ASCLEPIOS Project, F-06902 Sophia Antipolis, France
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Lab Neuro Imaging, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.027
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Modeling and understanding the variability of brain structures is a fundamental problem in neurosciences. Improved mathematical representations of structural brain variation are needed to help detect and understand genetic or disease related sources of abnormality, as well as to improve statistical power when integrating functional brain mapping data across subjects. In this paper, we develop a new mathematical model of normal brain variation based on a large set of cortical sulcal landmarks (72 per brain) delineated in each of 98 healthy human subjects scanned with 3D MRI (age: 51.8 +/- 16.2 years). We propose an original method to compute an average representation of the sulcal curves, which constitutes the mean anatomy. After affine alignment of the individual data across subjects, the second order moment distribution of the sulcal position is modeled as a sparse field of covariance tensors (symmetric, positive definite matrices). To extrapolate this information to the full brain, one has to overcome the limitations of the standard Euclidean matrix calculus. We propose an affine-invariant Riemannian framework to perform computations with tensors. in particular, we generalize radial basis function (RBF) interpolation and harmonic diffusion partial differential equations (PDEs) to tensor fields. As a result, we obtain a dense 3D variability map that agrees well with prior results on smaller subject samples. Moreover, "leave one (sulcus) out" tests show that our model is globally able to recover the missing information on brain variation when there is a consistent neighboring pattern of variability. Finally, we propose an innovative method to analyze the asymmetry of brain variability. As expected, the greatest asymmetries are found in regions that includes the primary language areas. Interestingly, any such asymmetries in anatomical variance, if it remains after anatomical normalization, could explain why there may be greater power to detect group activation in one hemisphere versus the other in fMRI studies. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:639 / 650
页数:12
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Log-euclidean metrics for fast and simple calculus on diffusion tensors [J].
Arsigny, Vincent ;
Fillard, Pierre ;
Pennec, Xavier ;
Ayache, Nicholas .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2006, 56 (02) :411-421
[2]   Unified segmentation [J].
Ashburner, J ;
Friston, KJ .
NEUROIMAGE, 2005, 26 (03) :839-851
[3]  
Bakircioglu M, 1998, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V6, P329
[4]  
BARILLOT C, 1998, FUNCTIONAL MAPPING H, V7, P796
[5]   A rigorous framework for diffusion tensor calculus [J].
Batchelor, PG ;
Moakher, M ;
Atkinson, D ;
Calamante, F ;
Connelly, A .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2005, 53 (01) :221-225
[6]  
BAUMBERG A, 1994, LECT NOTES COMPUTER, V800, P299
[7]   Association of DISC1/TRAX haplotypes with schizophrenia, reduced prefrontal gray matter, and impaired short- and long-term memory [J].
Cannon, TD ;
Hennah, W ;
van Erp, TGM ;
Thompson, PM ;
Lonnqvist, J ;
Huttunen, M ;
Gasperoni, T ;
Tuulio-Henriksson, A ;
Pirkola, T ;
Toga, AW ;
Kaprio, J ;
Mazziotta, J ;
Peltonen, L .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 62 (11) :1205-1213
[8]   Automatic 3-D model-based neuroanatomical segmentation [J].
Collins, DL ;
Holmes, CJ ;
Peters, TM ;
Evans, AC .
HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 1995, 3 (03) :190-208
[9]   ACTIVE SHAPE MODELS - THEIR TRAINING AND APPLICATION [J].
COOTES, TF ;
TAYLOR, CJ ;
COOPER, DH ;
GRAHAM, J .
COMPUTER VISION AND IMAGE UNDERSTANDING, 1995, 61 (01) :38-59
[10]   Interindividual functional mapping: a nonlinear local approach [J].
Corouge, I ;
Hellier, P ;
Gibaud, B ;
Barillot, C .
NEUROIMAGE, 2003, 19 (04) :1337-1348