Optimization of inverse treatment planning using a fuzzy weight function

被引:23
作者
Li, RP [1 ]
Yin, FF [1 ]
机构
[1] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
关键词
uncertainty; radiation treatment planning; optimization; fuzzy weight function;
D O I
10.1118/1.598931
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A fuzzy approach has been applied to inverse treatment planning optimization in radiation therapy. The proposed inverse-planning algorithm optimizes both the intensity-modulated beam (LMB) and the normal tissue prescription. In the LMB optimization, we developed a fast-monotonic-descent (FMD) method that has the property of fast and monotonic convergence to the minimum for a constrained quadratic objective function. In addition, a fuzzy weight function is employed to express the vague knowledge about the importance of matching the calculated dose to the prescribed dose in the normal tissue. Then, a validity function is established to optimize the normal tissue prescription. The performance of this new fuzzy prescription algorithm has been compared to that based on hard prescription methods for two treatment geometries. The FMD method presented here both provides a full-analytical solution to the optimization of intensity-modulated beams, and guarantees fast and monotonic convergence to the minimum. It has been shown that the fuzzy inverse planning technique is capable of achieving an optimal balance between the objective of matching the calculated dose to the prescribed dose for the target volume and the objective of minimizing the normal tissue dose. (C) 2000 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:691 / 700
页数:10
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Optimized planning using physical objectives and constraints [J].
Bortfeld, T .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 1999, 9 (01) :20-+
[2]   METHODS OF IMAGE-RECONSTRUCTION FROM PROJECTIONS APPLIED TO CONFORMATION RADIOTHERAPY [J].
BORTFELD, T ;
BURKELBACH, J ;
BOESECKE, R ;
SCHLEGEL, W .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1990, 35 (10) :1423-1434
[3]   SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES IN RADIATION-THERAPY OPTIMIZATION AND TOMOGRAPHIC RECONSTRUCTION [J].
BRAHME, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMAGING SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 6 (01) :6-13
[4]  
BRAHME A, 1997, 12 INT C US COMP RAD, P5
[5]   Optimization of intensity modulated beams with volume constraints using two methods: Cost function minimization and projections onto convex sets [J].
Cho, PS ;
Lee, S ;
Marks, RJ ;
Oh, SH ;
Sutlief, SG ;
Phillips, MH .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (04) :435-443
[6]   A continuous penalty function method for inverse treatment planning [J].
Hristov, DH ;
Fallone, BG .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (02) :208-223
[7]  
LEVENGRUN S, 1997, 12 INT C US COMP RAD, P248
[8]   Variation method for inverse treatment planning [J].
Liu, Y ;
Yin, FF ;
Gao, QH .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (03) :356-363
[9]   Inverse radiation treatment planning using the Dynamically Penalized Likelihood method [J].
Llacer, J .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (11) :1751-1764
[10]   THE POTENTIAL AND LIMITATIONS OF THE INVERSE RADIOTHERAPY TECHNIQUE [J].
MOHAN, R ;
WANG, XH ;
JACKSON, A ;
BORTFELD, T ;
BOYER, AL ;
KUTCHER, GJ ;
LEIBEL, SA ;
FUKS, Z ;
LING, CC .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1994, 32 (03) :232-248