Why is grammaticalization irreversible?

被引:227
作者
Haspelmath, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Evolut Anthropol, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1515/ling.37.6.1043
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Grammaticalization, the change by which lexical categories become functional categories, is overwhelmingly irreversible. Prototypical functional categories never become prototypical lexical categories, and less radical changes against the general directionality of grammaticalization are extremely rare. Although the pervasiveness of grammaticalization has long been known, the question of why this change is irreversible has not been asked until fairly recently. However; no satisfactory explanation has been proposed so far. Irreversibility cannot be attributed to the lack of predictability, to the interplay of the motivating factors of economy and clarity, or to a preference for simple structures in language acquisition. I propose an explanation that follows the general structure of Keller'S (1994) invisible-hand theory: language change is shown to result from the cumulation of countless individual actions of speakers, which are nor intended to change language, but whose side effect is change in a particular direction. Grammaticalization is a side effect of the maxim of extravagance, that is, speakers' use of unusually explicit formulations in order to attract attention. As these are adopted more widely in the speech community, they become more frequent and are I educed phonologically. I propose that degrammaticalization is by and large impossible because there is no counteracting maxim of "anti-extravagance," and because speakers have no conscious access to grammaticalized expressions and thus cannot use them in place of less grammaticalized ones. This is thus a usage-based explanation, in which the notion of imperfect language acquisition as the locus of change plays no role.
引用
收藏
页码:1043 / 1068
页数:26
相关论文
共 56 条
[21]  
HASPELMATH M, 1998, LINGUA, V109
[22]  
HEINE B, 1991, GRAMMATICLIZATION CO
[23]  
Heine Bernd., 1984, GRAMMATICALIZATION R
[24]  
Hopper Paul J., 1993, GRAMMATICALIZATION
[25]  
HORN W, 1921, SPRACHKORPER SPRACHF
[26]  
Jaeggli Osvaldo A, 1982, Topics in Romance Syntax
[27]  
Keller Rudi., 1994, LANGUAGE CHANGE INVI
[28]  
Keller Rudi., 1990, SPRACHWANDEL UNSICHT
[29]  
KLAUSENBURGER J, 1999, HIST LINGUISTICS 199, P191
[30]  
Koch Peter., 1996, Z LITERATURWISSENSCH, V26, P64, DOI [10.1007/BF03396105, DOI 10.1007/BF03396105]