Comparison of the performance of butanol and pentanol as modifiers in the micellar chromatographic determination of some phenethylamines

被引:39
作者
Gil-Agustí, M
Torres-Lapasió, JR
García-Alvarez-Coque, MC
Esteve-Romero, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jaume 1, Area Quim Analit, Castello 12006, Spain
[2] Univ Navarra, Dept Quim & Edafol, Navarra 31080, Spain
[3] Univ Valencia, Dept Quim Analit, E-46100 Valencia, Spain
关键词
mobile phase composition; phenethylamines; butanol; pentanol; sodium dodecyl sulfate;
D O I
10.1016/S0021-9673(99)01037-7
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A procedure was developed for the determination of several phenethylamines (amphetamine, arterenol, ephedrine, phenylephrine, phenylpropanolamine, mephentermine, methoxyphenamine, pseudoephedrine and tyramine), using micellar mobile phases of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), a C-18 column and UV detection. The drugs were eluted at short retention times with conventional acetonitrile-water or methanol-water mobile phases. In contrast, in the micellar system, they were strongly retained due to association with the surfactant adsorbed on the stationary phase, and needed the addition of butanol or pentanol to be eluted from the column. These modifiers allowed a simple way of controlling the retention. The chromatographic efficiencies obtained with the hybrid mobile phases of SDS-butanol and SDS-pentanol were also very high, mostly in the N=3000-7000 range, significantly greater than those achieved with a conventional acetonitrile-methanol-water mobile phase. Butanol and pentanol yielded similar selectivities, but the latter modifier permitted significantly shorter retention times than butanol, and was preferred to expedite the analysis of the pharmaceuticals. Most binary combinations of the nine phenethylamines can be resolved with these mobile phases. A mobile phase of 0.15 M SDS-5% pentanol was used to assay five of the phenethylamines (amphetamine, ephedrine, phenylephrine, phenylpropanolamine and pseudoephedrine) in 22 pharmaceutical preparations, which contained diverse accompanying compounds. The results agreed with the declared compositions and with those obtained with a mobile phase of methanol-acetonitrile-0.05 M phosphate buffer (pH 3) 10:5:85, with no interferences and relative errors usually below 2%. However, with the aqueous-organic mobile phase, the retention time for phenylephrine was too low and could not be usually evaluated. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 49
页数:15
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   SIMULTANEOUS DETERMINATION OF PHENYLPROPANOLAMINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND ISOPROPAMIDE IN CAPSULE BY HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY USING CROWNPAK COLUMN [J].
AHMED, AEHN .
ANALYTICAL LETTERS, 1993, 26 (06) :1153-1162
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1979, MICELLIZATION SOLUBI, V1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1990, COMPREHENSIVE MED CH
[4]   Causes and remediation of reduced efficiency in micellar liquid chromatography [J].
Berthod, A .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 1997, 780 (1-2) :191-206
[5]  
BERTHOD A, IN PRESS MICELLAR LI
[7]  
Bonet-Domingo E., 1992, ANALYST, V117, P843
[8]   A MICELLAR LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHIC PROCEDURE FOR THE DETERMINATION OF AMILORIDE, BENDROFLUMETHIAZIDE, CHLORTHALIDONE, SPIRONOLACTONE AND TRIAMTERENE IN PHARMACEUTICALS [J].
BONETDOMINGO, E ;
MEDINAHERNANDEZ, MJ ;
GARCIAALVAREZCOQUE, MC .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, 1993, 11 (08) :711-716
[9]  
Carda-Broch S, 1998, ANALYST, V123, P301
[10]  
CHAWLA JL, 1997, INDIAN DRUGS, V34, P339