Minimally invasive pancreatic resections: cost and value perspectives

被引:27
作者
Conlon, Kevin C. [1 ]
de Rooij, Thijs [2 ]
van Hilst, Jony [2 ]
Abu Hidal, Mohammad [3 ]
Fleshman, Julie [4 ]
Talamonti, Mark [5 ]
Vanounou, Tsafrir
Garfinkle, Richard [6 ]
Velanovich, Vic [6 ,7 ]
Kooby, David [8 ]
Vollmer, Charles M. [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dublin, Trinity Coll Dublin, Professorial Surg Unit, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Southampton, Dept Surg, Southampton, Hants, England
[4] Pancreat Canc Act Network, Manhattan Beach, CA USA
[5] North Shore Univ Hlth Syst, Dept Surg, Chicago, IL USA
[6] McGill Univ, Dept Oncol, Gerald Bronfman, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[7] Univ S Florida, Div Gen Surg, Tampa, FL USA
[8] Emory Univ, Dept Surg, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[9] Univ Penn, Dept Surg, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; OPEN PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; ROBOTIC PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA; SINGLE INSTITUTION; ENHANCED RECOVERY; LEARNING-CURVE; FEASIBILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.hpb.2017.01.019
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The number of minimally invasive pancreatic resections (MIPR) performed for benign or malignant disease, have increased in recent years. However, there is limited information regarding cost/value implications. Methods: An international conference evaluating MIPR was held during the 12th Bi-Annual International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA) World Congress in Sao Paulo, Brazil, on April 20th, 2016. This manuscript summarizes the presentations that reviewed current topics in cost and value as they pertain to MIPR. Results: Compared to the open approach, MIPR's are associated with higher operative costs but lower postoperative costs. However, measurements of patient value ( defined as improvement in both quantity and quality of life) and financial value ( using incremental cost-effectiveness ratio) are required to determine the true value at societal level. Conclusion: Challenges remain as to how the potential benefits, both to the patient and the healthcare system as a whole, are measured. Research comparing MIPR versus other techniques for pancreatectomy will require appropriate and valid measurement tools, some of which are yet to be refined. Nonetheless, the experience to date would support the continued development of MIPR by experienced surgeons in high-volume pancreatic centers, married with appropriate review and recalibration.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 233
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a clinical and cost-effectiveness study
    Abu Hilal, Mohammad
    Hamdan, Mohammed
    Di Fabio, Francesco
    Pearce, Neil W.
    Johnson, Colin D.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (06): : 1670 - 1674
  • [2] Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Cancer Practice Patterns and Short-term Outcomes Among 7061 Patients
    Adam, Mohamed Abdelgadir
    Choudhury, Kingshuk
    Dinan, Michaela A.
    Reed, Shelby D.
    Scheri, Randall P.
    Blazer, Dan G., III
    Roman, Sanziana A.
    Sosa, Julie A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2015, 262 (02) : 372 - 377
  • [3] Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: role in 2014 and beyond
    Baker, Erin H.
    Ross, Samuel W.
    Seshadri, Ramanathan
    Swan, Ryan Z.
    Iannitti, David A.
    Vrochides, Dionisios
    Martinie, John B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 6 (04) : 396 - 405
  • [4] Minimally invasive surgical approach to pancreatic malignancies
    Bencini, Lapo
    Annecchiarico, Mario
    Farsi, Marco
    Bartolini, Ilenia
    Mirasolo, Vita
    Guerra, Francesco
    Coratti, Andrea
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 7 (12) : 411 - 421
  • [5] Feasibility of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Boggi, U.
    Signori, S.
    De Lio, N.
    Perrone, V. G.
    Vistoli, F.
    Belluomini, M.
    Cappelli, C.
    Amorese, G.
    Mosca, F.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (07) : 917 - 925
  • [6] Results of 100 consecutive laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies: postoperative outcome, cost-benefit analysis, and quality of life assessment
    Braga, Marco
    Pecorelli, Nicolo
    Ferrari, Denise
    Balzano, Gianpaolo
    Zuliani, Walter
    Castoldi, Renato
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (07): : 1871 - 1878
  • [7] A prospective non-randomised single-center study comparing laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy
    Butturini, Giovanni
    Damoli, Isacco
    Crepaz, Lorenzo
    Malleo, Giuseppe
    Marchegiani, Giovanni
    Daskalaki, Despoina
    Esposito, Alessandro
    Cingarlini, Sara
    Salvia, Roberto
    Bassi, Claudio
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (11): : 3163 - 3170
  • [8] Robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective, matched, mid-term follow-up study
    Chen, Shi
    Chen, Jiang-Zhi
    Zhan, Qian
    Deng, Xia-Xing
    Shen, Bai-Yong
    Peng, Cheng-Hong
    Li, Hong-Wei
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (12): : 3698 - 3711
  • [9] Business plan writing for physicians
    Cohn, KH
    Schwartz, RW
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 184 (02) : 114 - 120
  • [10] Total Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Oncologic Advantages Over Open Approaches?
    Croome, Kristopher P.
    Farnell, Michael B.
    Que, Florencia G.
    Reid-Lombardo, KMarie
    Truty, Mark J.
    Nagorney, David M.
    Kendrick, Michael L.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2014, 260 (04) : 633 - 640