Comparison of the repeatability of quantitative data measured in high-performance liquid chromatography with UV and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometric detection

被引:6
作者
Chen, YB
Kele, M
Tuinman, AA
Guiochon, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Dept Chem, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[2] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Div Chem & Analyt Sci, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
repeatability; retention time; peak area; column efficiency;
D O I
10.1016/S0021-9673(99)01327-8
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A detailed comparison of the repeatability of the retention times, the peak efficiencies and the peak areas of a dozen probe compounds achieved in HPLC, using either HPLC-UV or HPLC-MS for detection purpose, is reported. Three groups of conventional analytes, each one separated under a different set of experimental conditions, were selected for this study. Most of the compounds are basic, the other ones being neutral. The repeatabilities of the retention times do not exhibit any influence of the mode of detection. However, the repeatabilities of the peak areas and the column efficiencies are generally (although not always) better in HPLC-UV than that in HPLC-MS. On average, the precision for the UV peak area detection was 2.5% versus 6.8% for MS detection. Experimental results show that the response factor of the UV detector is more constant than that of the MS detector, probably because the HPLC flow-rate was sufficiently stable. The results obtained in the different tests are discussed. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 173
页数:11
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   HPLC analysis of fat-soluble vitamins on standard and narrow bore columns with UV, electrochemical and particle beam MS detection [J].
Andreoli, R ;
Careri, M ;
Manini, P ;
Mori, G ;
Musci, M .
CHROMATOGRAPHIA, 1997, 44 (11-12) :605-612
[2]   Comparative investigation of UV, electrochemical and particle beam mass spectrometric detection for the high-performance liquid chromatographic determination of benzoic and cinnamic acids and of their corresponding phenolic acids [J].
Bocchi, C ;
Careri, M ;
Groppi, F ;
Mangia, A ;
Manini, P ;
Mori, G .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 1996, 753 (02) :157-170
[3]   Validated HPLC/MS/MS assay for CI-1011 in rat plasma and a comparison with an HPLC/UV assay [J].
Bullen, WW ;
Lathia, CD ;
Abel, RB ;
Hayes, RN .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, 1998, 17 (08) :1399-1413
[4]   Optimization of the atmospheric pressure chemical ionization liquid chromatography mass spectrometry interface [J].
Garcia, DM ;
Huang, SK ;
Stansbury, WF .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR MASS SPECTROMETRY, 1996, 7 (01) :59-65
[5]  
Goedert M., 1973, CHROMATOGRAPHIA, V6, P76
[6]  
Guiochon G, 1998, AM LAB, V30, P14
[7]   CONCENTRATION + MASS FLOW RATE SENSITIVE DETECTORS IN GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY [J].
HALASZ, I .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1964, 36 (08) :1428-&
[8]   Microliter sample introduction technique for microwave-induced plasma mass spectrometry [J].
Huang, M ;
Shirasaki, T ;
Hirabayashi, A ;
Koizumi, H .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1999, 71 (02) :427-432
[9]  
Ingle Jr J. D., 1988, SPECTROCHEMICAL ANAL
[10]   Repeatability and reproducibility of retention data and band profiles on reversed-phase liquid chromatography columns I. Experimental protocol [J].
Kele, M ;
Guiochon, G .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 1999, 830 (01) :41-54