Assessing quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer - Cross-validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life head and neck module (QLQ-H&N35)

被引:177
作者
Sherman, AC
Simonton, S
Adams, DC
Vural, E
Owens, B
Hanna, E
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Arkansas Canc Res Ctr, Div Behav Med, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
[2] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Arkansas Canc Res Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archotol.126.4.459
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the reliability and validity of a new, disease-specific quality-of-life measure for patients with head and neck cancer: the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-QLQ-H&N35. Design: Cross-sectional study using questionnaire data and medical chart review. Setting: Academic tertiary care otolaryngology clinic. Participants: One hundred twenty ambulatory patients, including 30 patients with advanced head and neck cancer in each of the following stages of treatment: (1) prior to treatment, (2) during active treatment, (3) within 6 months of completing treatment, and (4) more than 6 months after completing treatment. In addition, (5) a comparison group of 40 patients without malignant disease was included (total sample, N = 160). Main Outcome Measures: Scores on EORTC Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and head and neck module (QLQ-H&N35), Profile of Mood States, and Impact of Events Scale. Results: The QLQ-H&N35 demonstrated acceptable reliability (internal consistency). It successfully discriminated between cancer patients and the comparison group, and among subgroups of cancer patients at different phases of treatment (construct validity). The instrument was sensitive to the effects of radiation treatment and to site of disease. Its low-to-moderate correlations with the EORTC core questionnaire indicated that the QLQ-H&N35 provided unique information (discriminant validity). Scores were significantly associated with a number of demographic variables. Conclusion: Results support the use of this disease-specific measure to assess quality of life among patients with advanced head and neck cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 467
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [21] COPING WITH CANCER
    MANUEL, GM
    ROTH, S
    KEEFE, FJ
    BRANTLEY, BA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HUMAN STRESS, 1987, 13 (04): : 149 - 158
  • [22] McNair D.M., 1992, EDITS MANUAL PROFILE, P1
  • [23] EVOLUTION OF QUALITY-OF-LIFE ASSESSMENT IN HEAD AND NECK-CANCER
    MORTON, RP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1995, 109 (11) : 1029 - 1035
  • [24] Fatigue in patients with cancer: Results with National Cancer Institute of Canada clinical trials group studies employing the EORTC QLQ-C30
    Pater, JL
    Zee, B
    Palmer, M
    Johnston, D
    Osoba, D
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 1997, 5 (05) : 410 - 413
  • [25] MEASURING THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF CANCER-PATIENTS - THE FUNCTIONAL LIVING INDEX, CANCER - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION
    SCHIPPER, H
    CLINCH, J
    MCMURRAY, A
    LEVITT, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1984, 2 (05) : 472 - 483
  • [26] WHO SHOULD MEASURE QUALITY OF LIFE, THE DOCTOR OR THE PATIENT
    SLEVIN, ML
    PLANT, H
    LYNCH, D
    DRINKWATER, J
    GREGORY, WM
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1988, 57 (01) : 109 - 112
  • [27] THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER APPROACH TO QUALITY-OF-LIFE ASSESSMENT - GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPING QUESTIONNAIRE MODULES
    SPRANGERS, MAG
    CULL, A
    BJORDAL, K
    GROENVOLD, M
    AARONSON, NK
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1993, 2 (04) : 287 - 295
  • [28] Terrell JE, 1997, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V123, P1125
  • [29] CHOOSING MEASURES OF HEALTH-STATUS FOR INDIVIDUALS IN GENERAL POPULATIONS
    WARE, JE
    BROOK, RH
    DAVIES, AR
    LOHR, KN
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1981, 71 (06) : 620 - 625
  • [30] THE MOS 36-ITEM SHORT-FORM HEALTH SURVEY (SF-36) .1. CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK AND ITEM SELECTION
    WARE, JE
    SHERBOURNE, CD
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1992, 30 (06) : 473 - 483