Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory

被引:725
作者
Wixted, John T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Psychol, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
关键词
signal-detection theory; dual-process theory; recollection; familiarity; recognition memory; FINITE MIXTURE DISTRIBUTIONS; RETRIEVAL-PROCESSES; ASSOCIATIVE INFORMATION; SEPARATE PROCESSES; DECISION-PROCESSES; PROCESS MODELS; RECOLLECTION; FAMILIARITY; FREQUENCY; JUDGMENTS;
D O I
10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.152
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Two influential models of recognition memory, the unequal-variance signal-detection model and a dual-process threshold/detection model, accurately describe the receiver operating characteristic, but only the latter model can provide estimates of recollection and familiarity. Such estimates often accord with those provided by the remember-know procedure, and both methods are now widely used in the neuroscience literature to identify the brain correlates of recollection and familiarity. However, in recent years, a substantial literature has accumulated directly contrasting the signal-detection model against the threshold/detection model, and that literature is almost unanimous in its endorsement of signal-detection theory. A dual-process version of signal-detection theory implies that individual recognition decisions are not process pure, and it suggests new ways to investigate the brain correlates of recognition memory.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 176
页数:25
相关论文
共 107 条
[51]  
HOCKLEY WE, 1991, RELATING THEORY AND DATA : ESSAYS ON HUMAN MEMORY IN HONOR OF BENNET B MURDOCK, P227
[52]   Aging selectively impairs recollection in recognition memory for pictures: Evidence from modeling and receiver operating characteristic curves [J].
Howard, MW ;
Bessette-Symons, B ;
Zhang, YF ;
Hoyer, WJ .
PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2006, 21 (01) :96-106
[54]   ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL MEMORY AND PERCEPTUAL-LEARNING [J].
JACOBY, LL ;
DALLAS, M .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1981, 110 (03) :306-340
[55]   SOURCE MONITORING [J].
JOHNSON, MK ;
HASHTROUDI, S ;
LINDSAY, DS .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1993, 114 (01) :3-28
[56]   On the nature of associative information in recognition memory [J].
Kelley, R ;
Wixted, JT .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2001, 27 (03) :701-722
[57]   WHAT DOES A PERSON IN A TOT STATE KNOW THAT A PERSON IN A DONT KNOW STATE DOESNT KNOW [J].
KORIAT, A ;
LIEBLICH, I .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1974, 2 (04) :647-655
[58]   What do we know about what we cannot remember? Accessing the semantic attributes of words that cannot be recalled [J].
Koriat, A ;
Levy-Sadot, R ;
Edry, E ;
de Marcas, S .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2003, 29 (06) :1095-1105
[59]   Separating sensitivity from response bias: Implications of comparisons of yes-no and forced-choice tests for models and measures of recognition memory [J].
Kroll, NEA ;
Yonelinas, AP ;
Dobbins, IG ;
Frederick, CM .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2002, 131 (02) :241-254
[60]  
Macmillan N. A., 2005, Detection Theory: A User's Guide