Impact of Deceased Donor Diabetes Mellitus on Kidney Transplant Outcomes: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

被引:22
作者
Ahmad, Mufazzal [1 ]
Cole, Edward H. [1 ]
Cardella, Carl J. [1 ]
Cattran, Daniel C. [1 ]
Schiff, Jeffrey [1 ]
Tinckam, Kathryn J. [1 ]
Kim, S. Joseph [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Kidney Transplant Program, Dept Med,Toronto Gen Hosp,Div Nephrol,Fac Med, Toronto, ON M5G 2N2, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Deceased donor; Diabetes mellitus; Kidney transplant outcomes; Propensity score; CADAVER KIDNEYS; NEPHROPATHY; RECIPIENTS; HYPERTENSION; SURVIVAL; REVERSAL; RECOVERY; INJURY; RATS; POOL;
D O I
10.1097/TP.0b013e3181ac68a9
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. There is a paucity of population-level data on the long-term outcomes of kidney transplants from deceased donors with a history of diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods. We examined the association of donor DM with graft and patient survival in 66,654 deceased donor kidney transplant recipients (KTR) from January 1, 1994, to December 31, 2003, in the United States. KTR receiving kidneys from DM versus non-DM donors were compared in the total study population and in a 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort. Results. A total of 2302 KTR received kidneys from DM donors over the study period. Older and female recipients, increased donor age, longer cold ischemia time, and transplants after 2000 were associated with a greater odds of receiving a DM donor. After propensity score matching, Cox proportional hazards models revealed hazard ratios of 1.11 (95% CI: 1.02-1.22), 1.17 (95% CI: 1.04-1.33), and 1.06 (95% CI: 0.94-1.18) for graft failure, death-censored graft failure, and patient mortality, respectively. No significant effect measure modification was seen across various patient subgroups. Longer duration of donor DM was generally associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes. The results were robust to several sensitivity analyses. Conclusions. The long-term graft survival of KTR with DM donors is significantly inferior to non-DM donors, but the absolute difference is small. DM donors do not adversely impact patient survival. This suggests that DM donors may be effectively used to expand the donor pool, but evidence-based guidelines on the appropriate selection of these donors are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 260
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[11]   STANDARD DISTANCE IN UNIVARIATE AND MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS [J].
FLURY, BK ;
RIEDWYL, H .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1986, 40 (03) :249-251
[12]   Indications for propensity scores and review of their use in pharmacoepidemiology [J].
Glynn, RJ ;
Schneeweiss, S ;
Stürmer, T .
BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2006, 98 (03) :253-259
[13]   Renal disease and hypertension in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus [J].
Ismail, N ;
Becker, B ;
Strzelczyk, P ;
Ritz, E .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 55 (01) :1-28
[14]  
Joffe MM, 1999, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V150, P327
[15]   POSTISCHEMIC RECOVERY PROCESS OF RENAL OXYGEN-CONSUMPTION IN NORMAL AND STREPTOZOTOCIN-DIABETIC RATS [J].
KURAMOCHI, G ;
HOMMA, S .
RENAL FAILURE, 1993, 15 (05) :587-594
[16]  
MADDEN RL, 1993, TRANSPLANT P, V25, P1568
[17]   Hyperglycaemia and renal ischaemia-reperfusion injury [J].
Melin, J ;
Hellberg, O ;
Fellström, B .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 18 (03) :460-462
[18]   Ischemia causes rapidly progressive nephropathy in the diabetic rat [J].
Melin, J ;
Hellberg, O ;
Akyurek, LM ;
Kallskog, O ;
Larsson, E ;
Fellstrom, BC .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 52 (04) :985-991
[19]   Deceased-donor characteristics and the survival benefit of kidney transplantation [J].
Merion, RM ;
Ashby, VB ;
Wolfe, RA ;
Distant, DA ;
Hulbert-Shearon, TE ;
Metzger, RA ;
Ojo, AO ;
Port, FK .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 294 (21) :2726-2733
[20]   Validating recommendations for coronary angiography following acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: A matched analysis using propensity scores [J].
Normand, SLT ;
Landrum, NB ;
Guadagnoli, E ;
Ayanian, JZ ;
Ryan, TJ ;
Cleary, PD ;
McNeil, BJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 54 (04) :387-398