Scaling Relationships in Life Cycle Assessment The Case of Heat Production from Biomass and Heat Pumps

被引:83
作者
Caduff, Marloes [1 ]
Huijbregts, Mark A. J. [2 ]
Koehler, Annette [1 ]
Althaus, Hans-Joerg [3 ]
Hellweg, Stefanie [1 ]
机构
[1] ETH, Inst Environm Engn, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Environm Sci, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Swiss Fed Labs Mat Testing & Res, Empa, Dubendorf, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
empirical modeling; global warming potential; heat production systems; scaling factors; size scaling; space heating; ECONOMIES; COSTS;
D O I
10.1111/jiec.12122
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Life cycle assessment (LCA) studies include a vast amount of different products. Often, extrapolations are necessary to obtain the life cycle inventory of a specific product. This article provides quantitative scaling factors with power (heat output) for product properties and life cycle impact assessment results of heat pump and biomass furnace technologies. Included in the study are 508 heat pumps and furnaces with differences in power over three orders of magnitude per product group. The key properties of the heat pump system were defined as mass, refrigerant use, and coefficient of performance. For the biomass furnaces, the key properties analyzed were mass, electrical input, and efficiency. The results indicated that both the mass and the refrigerant use increased subproportionally to power. For coefficient of performance and furnace efficiency, no scaling effect was found. Subproportional growth was found between two environmental impacts (global warming and ozone depletion) and power for the production phase. This scaling behavior was similar to conventional cost scaling. The results of our study imply that in LCA, scaling factors can be applied to estimate key properties and corresponding life cycle impact assessment results. This is particularly useful for prospective technology assessments with limited data available.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 406
页数:14
相关论文
共 32 条
[21]  
Goedkoop M., 2009, LIFE CYCLE IMPACT AS, P1
[22]   Application of life cycle assessment to the structural optimization of process flowsheets [J].
Guillen-Gosalbez, Gonzalo ;
Antonio Caballero, Jose ;
Jimenez, Laureano .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2008, 47 (03) :777-789
[23]  
GUTHRIE KM, 1969, CHEM ENG-NEW YORK, V76, P114
[24]  
GUTHRIE KM, 1970, CHEM ENG-NEW YORK, V77, P140
[25]  
HALL RS, 1988, CHEM ENG-NEW YORK, V95, P66
[26]  
Maroulis ZB., 2008, Food plant economics, V1st
[27]  
McDonald B., 2002, Res. Lett. Inf. Math. Sci, V3, P127
[28]   ECONOMIES OF SCALE - SOME STATISTICAL EVIDENCE [J].
MOORE, FT .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1959, 73 (02) :232-245
[29]  
REMER DS, 1990, CHEM ENG-NEW YORK, V97, P138
[30]   Is it only CO2 that matters? A life cycle perspective on shallow geothermal systems [J].
Saner, Dominik ;
Juraske, Ronnie ;
Kuebert, Markus ;
Blum, Philipp ;
Hellweg, Stefanie ;
Bayer, Peter .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2010, 14 (07) :1798-1813