Systematic review of the staging performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in esophageal cancer

被引:264
作者
van Westreenen, HL
Westerterp, M
Bossuyt, PMM
Pruim, J
Sloof, GW
van Lanschot, JJB
Groen, H
Plukker, JTM
机构
[1] Univ Groningen Hosp, Dept Surg, Dept Nucl Med, PET Ctr, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen Hosp, Off Med Technol Assessment, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Nucl Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2004.01.083
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Despite the increasing number of publications concerning F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for staging of esophageal cancer and the increasing availability of this novel diagnostic modality, its exact role in preoperative staging of these tumors is still unknown. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature regarding the diagnostic performance of FDG-PET in preoperative staging of patients with esophageal cancer, and to calculate summary estimates of its sensitivity and specificity. Methods The databases of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for relevant studies. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of each study. A meta-analysis of the reported sensitivity and specificity of each study was performed. Results Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies had several design deficiencies. Pooled sensitivity and specificity for the detection of locoregional metastases were 0.51 (95% Cl, 0.34 to 0.69) and 0.84 (95% Cl, 0.76 to 0.91), respectively. For distant metastases, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.67 (95% Cl, 0.58 to 0.76) and 0.97 (95% Cl, 0.90 to 1.0), respectively. Conclusion FDG-PET showed moderate sensitivity and specificity for the detection of locoregional metastases, and reasonable sensitivity and specificity in detection of distant lymphatic and hematogenous metastases. (C) 2004 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:3805 / 3812
页数:8
相关论文
共 61 条
[21]   Carbon-11 choline or FDG-PET for staging of oesophageal cancer? [J].
Jager, PL ;
Que, TH ;
Vaalburg, W ;
Pruim, J ;
Elsinga, P ;
Plukker, JT .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2001, 28 (12) :1845-1849
[22]   Positron emission tomography for the staging of esophageal carcinoma [J].
Junginger, T ;
Kneist, W ;
Schreckenberger, M ;
Menzel, C ;
Oberholzer, K ;
Bartenstein, P .
DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2002, 127 (38) :1935-1941
[23]   Comparison between positron emission tomography and computed tomography in the use of the assessment of esophageal carcinoma [J].
Kato, H ;
Kuwano, H ;
Nakajima, M ;
Miyazaki, T ;
Yoshikawa, M ;
Ojima, H ;
Tsukada, K ;
Oriuchi, N ;
Inoue, T ;
Endo, K .
CANCER, 2002, 94 (04) :921-928
[24]   A systematic review of the staging performance of endoscopic ultrasound in gastro-oesophageal carcinoma [J].
Kelly, S ;
Harris, KM ;
Berry, E ;
Hutton, J ;
Roderick, P ;
Cullingworth, J ;
Gathercole, L ;
Smith, MA .
GUT, 2001, 49 (04) :534-539
[25]   Evaluation of lymph node metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus with positron emission tomography [J].
Kim, K ;
Park, SJ ;
Kim, BT ;
Lee, KS ;
Shim, YM .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2001, 71 (01) :290-294
[26]  
Kobori D, 1999, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V86, P1638, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19991101)86:9<1638::AID-CNCR4>3.0.CO
[27]  
2-U
[28]   Positron emission tomography for staging of oesophageal and gastroesophageal malignancy [J].
Kole, AC ;
Plukker, JT ;
Nieweg, OE ;
Vaalburg, W .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 78 (04) :521-527
[29]   SPECTRUM BIAS IN THE EVALUATION OF DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS - LESSONS FROM THE RAPID DIPSTICK TEST FOR URINARY-TRACT INFECTION [J].
LACHS, MS ;
NACHAMKIN, I ;
EDELSTEIN, PH ;
GOLDMAN, J ;
FEINSTEIN, AR ;
SCHWARTZ, JS .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1992, 117 (02) :135-140
[30]   Histopathologic validation of lymph node staging with FDG-PET scan in cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction - A prospective study based on primary surgery with extensive lymphadenectomy [J].
Lerut, T ;
Flamen, P ;
Ectors, N ;
Van Cutsem, E ;
Peeters, M ;
Hiele, M ;
De Wever, W ;
Coosemans, W ;
Decker, G ;
De Leyn, P ;
Deneffe, G ;
Van Raemdonck, D ;
Mortelmans, L .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2000, 232 (06) :743-751