GETTING CREDIT FOR PROACTIVE BEHAVIOR:SUPERVISOR REACTIONS DEPEND ON WHAT YOU VALUE AND HOW YOU FEEL

被引:387
作者
Grant, Adam M. [1 ]
Parker, Sharon [2 ]
Collins, Catherine [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Univ Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; INFLUENCE TACTICS; JOB-PERFORMANCE; WORK; PERSONALITY; JUDGMENTS; PEOPLE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.01128.x
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Although proactive behavior is important in organizations, it is not always appreciated by supervisors. To explain when supervisors reward proactivity with higher overall performance evaluations, we draw on attribution theory. We propose that employees' values and affect send signals about their underlying intentions, which influence supervisors' attributions about whether employees deserve credit for proactive behaviors. More specifically, we hypothesize that if employees express strong prosocial values or low negative affect, the proactive behaviors of voice, issue-selling, taking charge, and anticipatory helping will have stronger relationships with supervisors' performance evaluations. We test these hypotheses with samples of 103 managers and their direct supervisors (Study 1) and 55 firefighters and their platoon supervisors (Study 2). The hypotheses were supported in both studies, suggesting that proactive behaviors are more likely to contribute to higher supervisor performance evaluations when employees express strong prosocial values or low negative affect.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 55
页数:25
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   The effects of organizational citizenship behavior on performance judgments: A field study and a laboratory experiment [J].
Allen, TD ;
Rush, MC .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 83 (02) :247-260
[2]   It's the thought that counts: On perceiving how helpers decide to lend a hand [J].
Ames, DR ;
Flynn, FJ ;
Weber, EU .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2004, 30 (04) :461-474
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, A Scientific Collaboratory for the Development of Advanced Measures of Personality Traits and Other Individual Differences
[4]   Performance evaluation in work settings [J].
Arvey, RD ;
Murphy, KR .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 49 :141-168
[5]   Proactivity during organizational entry: The role of desire for control [J].
Ashford, SJ ;
Black, JS .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 81 (02) :199-214
[6]   THE PROACTIVE COMPONENT OF ORGANIZATIONAL-BEHAVIOR - A MEASURE AND CORRELATES [J].
BATEMAN, TS ;
CRANT, JM .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 1993, 14 (02) :103-118
[7]   Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or good actors? [J].
Bolino, MC .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1999, 24 (01) :82-98
[8]   The proactive employee: Managing workplace initiative [J].
Campbell, DJ .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE, 2000, 14 (03) :52-66
[9]   Interactive effects of situational judgment effectiveness and proactive personality on work perceptions and work outcomes [J].
Chan, D .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 91 (02) :475-481
[10]  
Cohen J., 2003, Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences