GETTING CREDIT FOR PROACTIVE BEHAVIOR:SUPERVISOR REACTIONS DEPEND ON WHAT YOU VALUE AND HOW YOU FEEL

被引:387
作者
Grant, Adam M. [1 ]
Parker, Sharon [2 ]
Collins, Catherine [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Univ Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; INFLUENCE TACTICS; JOB-PERFORMANCE; WORK; PERSONALITY; JUDGMENTS; PEOPLE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.01128.x
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Although proactive behavior is important in organizations, it is not always appreciated by supervisors. To explain when supervisors reward proactivity with higher overall performance evaluations, we draw on attribution theory. We propose that employees' values and affect send signals about their underlying intentions, which influence supervisors' attributions about whether employees deserve credit for proactive behaviors. More specifically, we hypothesize that if employees express strong prosocial values or low negative affect, the proactive behaviors of voice, issue-selling, taking charge, and anticipatory helping will have stronger relationships with supervisors' performance evaluations. We test these hypotheses with samples of 103 managers and their direct supervisors (Study 1) and 55 firefighters and their platoon supervisors (Study 2). The hypotheses were supported in both studies, suggesting that proactive behaviors are more likely to contribute to higher supervisor performance evaluations when employees express strong prosocial values or low negative affect.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 55
页数:25
相关论文
共 52 条
[21]   The dynamics of proactivity at work [J].
Grant, Adam M. ;
Ashford, Susan J. .
RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, VOL 28: AN ANNUAL SERIES OF ANALYTICAL ESSAYS AND CRITICAL REVIEWS, 2008, 28 :3-34
[22]   The significance of task significance: Job performance effects, relational mechanisms, and boundary conditions [J].
Grant, Adam M. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 93 (01) :108-124
[23]  
Griffin MA, 2007, ACAD MANAGE J, V50, P327, DOI 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24634438
[24]   CONFORMITY, STATUS, AND IDIOSYNCRASY CREDIT [J].
HOLLANDER, EP .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1958, 65 (02) :117-127
[25]   Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives [J].
Hu, Li-tze ;
Bentler, Peter M. .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 1999, 6 (01) :1-55
[26]   Instrumental values of organizational citizenship behavior for promotion: A field quasi-experiment [J].
Hui, C ;
Lam, SSK ;
Law, KKS .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 85 (05) :822-828
[27]   Liking and attributions of motives as mediators of the relationships between individuals' reputations, helpful behaviors, and raters' reward decisions [J].
Johnson, DE ;
Erez, A ;
Kiker, DS ;
Motowidlo, SJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 87 (04) :808-815
[28]   PROFITING FROM CONTROVERSY - LESSONS FROM THE PERSON-SITUATION DEBATE [J].
KENRICK, DT ;
FUNDER, DC .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1988, 43 (01) :23-34
[29]   The good soldier: who is, s(he)? [J].
Kidder, DL ;
Parks, JM .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2001, 22 (08) :939-959
[30]   INTRAORGANIZATIONAL INFLUENCE TACTICS - EXPLORATIONS IN GETTING ONES WAY [J].
KIPNIS, D ;
SCHMIDT, SM ;
WILKINSON, I .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1980, 65 (04) :440-452