Effect of varying atrial sensitivity, AV interval, and detection algorithm on automatic mode switching

Automatic mode switching (AMS) is absolutely dependent on atrial tachyarrhythmia detection. The effects of programming several features that could influence tachyarrhythmia detection were assessed in 18 patients (six women; mean age 64 pears) with pacemakers having AMS capability. The atrial electrogram amplitude in sinus rhythm at implant (SR-EGM), last measured atrial sensing threshold prior to tachycardia (A-SENS), and atrial sensing threshold for effective AMS during atrial tachyarrhythmia (AMS-SENS) were obtained. Additionally, ten patients had A intervals increased from 60 to 200 ms, while seven patients had detection algorithms made more stringent from 5 beats at 150 beats/min to 11 beats at 200 beats/min to assess their effects on AMS efficacy. Results: Sensitivities:Mean SR-EGM = 3.55 mV; mean A-SENS = 2.06 mV; and mean AMS-SENS = 1.46 mV. Fourteen patients developed atrial fibrillation and four atrial flutter. Thirteen of 14 patients who developed atrial fibrillation sensed adequately at greater than or equal to 1.0 mV normal sinus rhythm (NSR), but only six patients had effective AMS at these settings in atrial fibrillation. Three of four patients who developed atrial flutter had effective AMS at greater than or equal to 2.0 mV. AV Interval: was effective in eight of ten patients at AV intervals up to 200 ms. One patient lost AMS at an AV interval of 120 ms. Algorithm: In two of seven patients, AMS was not effective if the detection algorithm rt as more stringent than five beats at 150 beats/min. Conclusions: (II In atrial fibrillation, effective AMS requires more sensitive atrial settings than in NSR; (2) AV intervals as short as 220 ms can interfere with AMS function; and (3) More stringent detection algorithms may be inappropriate for effective RMS function.