Exchange fairness and employee performance: An examination of the relationship between organizational politics and procedural justice

被引:133
作者
Aryee, S
Chen, ZX
Budhwar, PS
机构
[1] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Dept Management, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Canberra, Sch Business & Govt, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[3] Aston Univ, Aston Business Sch, Birmingham B4 7ET, W Midlands, England
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.03.002
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Data obtained from a manufacturing firm and a newspaper firm in India were used to examine the relationship between organizational politics and procedural justice in three separate studies. Study I constructively replicated research on the distinctiveness of the two constructs. Confirmatory factor analyses in which data from the manufacturing firm served as the development sample and data from the newspaper firm served as the validation sample demonstrated the distinctiveness of organizational politics and procedural justice. Study 2 examined the antecedents of the two constructs using data from the manufacturing firm. Structural equation modeling (SEM) results revealed formalization and participation in decision making to be positively related to procedural justice but negatively related to organizational politics. Further, authority hierarchy and spatial distance were positively related to organizational politics but unrelated to procedural justice. Study 3 examined the consequences of the two constructs in terms of task and contextual performance using data from the newspaper firm. Results of SEM analysis revealed procedural justice but not organizational politics to be related to task performance and the contextual performance dimensions of interpersonal facilitation and job dedication. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 81 条
[11]  
Borman W.C., 1993, Personnel selection in organizations, P71, DOI DOI 10.1007/SPRINGERREFERENCE_7472
[12]   EFFECTS OF RATEE TASK-PERFORMANCE AND INTERPERSONAL FACTORS ON SUPERVISOR AND PEER PERFORMANCE RATINGS [J].
BORMAN, WC ;
WHITE, LA ;
DORSEY, DW .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 80 (01) :168-177
[13]   DISCRIMINANT VALIDATION OF MEASURES OF JOB-SATISFACTION, JOB INVOLVEMENT, AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT [J].
BROOKE, PP ;
RUSSELL, DW ;
PRICE, JL .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 73 (02) :139-145
[14]  
Browne M., 1993, TESTING STRUCTURAL E, P136, DOI [DOI 10.1177/0049124192021002005, 10.1177/0049124192021002005]
[15]  
Campbell J.P., 1990, HDB IND ORG PSYCHOL, V1, P687, DOI DOI 10.1026/1617-6391.3.3.135
[16]   The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis [J].
Cohen-Charash, Y ;
Spector, PE .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2001, 86 (02) :278-321
[17]   Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research [J].
Colquitt, JA ;
Conlon, DE ;
Wesson, MJ ;
Porter, COLH ;
Ng, KY .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 86 (03) :425-445
[18]   Distinguishing contextual performance from task performance for managerial jobs [J].
Conway, JM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 84 (01) :3-13
[19]  
Cropanzano R, 1997, J ORGAN BEHAV, V18, P159, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199703)18:2<159::AID-JOB795>3.0.CO
[20]  
2-D