Is Risk Analysis Scientific?

被引:81
作者
Hansson, Sven Ove [1 ]
Aven, Terje [2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Inst Technol, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Univ Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
关键词
Consensus; knowledge; norms; objectivity; probability; risk; science; uncertainty; values; SCIENCE; BENEFIT;
D O I
10.1111/risa.12230
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
This article discusses to what extent risk analysis is scientific in view of a set of commonly used definitions and criteria. We consider scientific knowledge to be characterized by its subject matter, its success in developing the best available knowledge in its fields of study, and the epistemic norms and values that guide scientific investigations. We proceed to assess the field of risk analysis according to these criteria. For this purpose, we use a model for risk analysis in which science is used as a base for decision making on risks, which covers the five elements evidence, knowledge base, broad risk evaluation, managerial review and judgment, and the decision; and that relates these elements to the domains experts and decisionmakers, and to the domains fact-based or value-based. We conclude that risk analysis is a scientific field of study, when understood as consisting primarily of (i) knowledge about risk-related phenomena, processes, events, etc., and (ii) concepts, theories, frameworks, approaches, principles, methods and models to understand, assess, characterize, communicate, and manage risk, in general and for specific applications (the instrumental part).
引用
收藏
页码:1173 / 1183
页数:11
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, BROOKLYN LAW R
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, RISK GOVERNANCE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1981, RISK ANAL
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, ANTIFRAGILE
[5]  
Aven T., 2011, Quantitative Risk Assessment: The Scientific Platform
[6]   Foundational Issues in Risk Assessment and Risk Management [J].
Aven, Terje ;
Zio, Enrico .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2014, 34 (07) :1164-1172
[7]   A new perspective on how to understand, assess and manage risk and the unforeseen [J].
Aven, Terje ;
Krohn, Bodil S. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2014, 121 :1-10
[8]   The risk concept-historical and recent development trends [J].
Aven, Terje .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2012, 99 :33-44
[9]   Selective critique of risk assessments with recommendations for improving methodology and practise [J].
Aven, Terje .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2011, 96 (05) :509-514
[10]   Some considerations on the treatment of uncertainties in risk assessment for practical decision making [J].
Aven, Terje ;
Zio, Enrico .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2011, 96 (01) :64-74