Nontransplantation of livers from deceased donors who are able to donate another solid organ: How often and why it happens

被引:20
作者
Sayuk, G. S.
Leet, T. L.
Schnitzler, M. A.
Hayashi, P. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Louis Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Liver, St Louis, MO 63104 USA
[2] St Louis Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Outcomes Res, St Louis, MO USA
[3] St Louis Univ, Sch Med, Div Epidemiol, St Louis, MO USA
[4] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Div Gastroenterol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
donation; procurement; transplantation; utilization;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01600.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Deceased donor factors associated with poor graft outcome are well known, but how often these factors lead to livers left untransplanted is poorly defined. A nested, case-control study was conducted using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database from 1987 to 2005. Only those donating >= 1 solid organ were included. Primary outcome was livers not transplanted (LNT, cases) versus transplanted (LT, controls). Primary variables for multivariate analysis were donor age and obesity. Covariates included donation after cardiac death (DCD), cerebral vascular accident death, viral serologies, cancer, ALT and bilirubin. There were 23 373 (26%) LNT's from 91 362 donors who donated at least one organ. Percent LNT fell over time (1987-1990: 48%; 1991-1995: 29%; 1996-2000: 21%; 2000-2005: 16%; p < 0.01). Increased age (odds ratio: 4.2, 95% confidence interval 3.6-4.9, p < 0.01) and obesity (2.1, 1.9-2.3, p < 0.01) were significantly associated with LNT across all time periods. Other significant factors included DCD and elevated ALT. For 2001-2005, population attributable risk indicate that age > 40, abnormal ALT and obesity account for 32.6%, 25.3% and 9.2% of untransplanted livers, respectively. Use of expanded criteria livers has pushed LNT lower in spite of an aging and heavier donor population. Nevertheless, age and obesity still account for a significant portion of untransplanted livers.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 160
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]
Impact of steatotic grafts on initial function and prognosis after liver transplantation [J].
Afonso, RC ;
Saad, WA ;
Parra, OM ;
Leitao, R ;
Ferraz-Neto, BH .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 36 (04) :909-911
[2]
[Anonymous], 2003, MMWR MORB MORTAL WKL, V52, P101
[3]
[Anonymous], 2003, MMWR MORB MORTAL WKL, V52, P106
[4]
[Anonymous], 1995, WHO TECHN REP SER
[5]
Influence of marginal donors on liver preservation injury [J].
Briceño, J ;
Marchal, T ;
Padillo, J ;
Solórzano, G ;
Pera, C .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 74 (04) :522-526
[6]
The utility of marginal donors in liver transplantation [J].
Busuttil, RW ;
Tanaka, K .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 9 (07) :651-663
[7]
AASLD/ILTS transplant course: Is there an extended donor suitable for everyone? [J].
Cameron, A ;
Busuttil, RW .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 11 (11) :S2-S5
[8]
Workgroup on expanded criteria organs for liver transplantation [J].
Delmonico, FL ;
Aufses, A ;
Bozorgzadeh, A ;
Delgado-Vega, D ;
Distant, DA ;
Dubler, NN ;
Emre, S ;
Feng, S ;
Freeman, RB ;
Fung, JJ ;
Gordon, FD ;
Hasz, RD ;
Kinkhabwala, M ;
Lake, JR ;
Merion, RM ;
Orlowski, J ;
Pinson, CW ;
Powell, T ;
Sheiner, PA ;
Teperman, L ;
Williams, C ;
Wong, HH ;
Novelle, AC ;
Osten, W ;
Wickens, L ;
Barhydt, N ;
Doesschate, J ;
Emrich, S ;
Maynus, D ;
McMurdo, L ;
Valente, K .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 11 (10) :1184-1192
[9]
Characteristics associated with liver graft failure: The concept of a donor risk index [J].
Feng, S ;
Goodrich, NP ;
Bragg-Gresham, JL ;
Dykstra, DM ;
Punch, JD ;
DebRoy, MA ;
Greenstein, SM ;
Merion, RM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 6 (04) :783-790
[10]
Impact of donor recipient, and graft features on the development of primary dysfunction in liver transplants [J].
Fernández-Merino, FJ ;
Nuño-Garza, J ;
López-Hervás, P ;
López-Buenadicha, A ;
Moreno-Caparrós, A ;
Quijano-Collazo, Y ;
Sanjuanbenito, A ;
Vicente-López, E .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 35 (05) :1793-1794