A combination of midazolam and ketamine for procedural sedation and analgesia in adult emergency department patients

被引:100
作者
Chudnofsky, CR
Weber, JE
Stoyanoff, PJ
Colone, PD
Wilkerson, MD
Hallinen, DL
Jaggi, FM
Boczar, ME
Perry, MA
机构
[1] Hurley Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Flint, MI 48503 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
procedural sedation; procedural analgesia; ketamine; midazolam;
D O I
10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb01064.x
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: To describe the clinical characteristics of a combination of midazolam and ketamine for procedural sedation and analgesia in adult emergency department (ED) patients. Methods: This was a prospective, observational trial, conducted in the ED of an urban level II trauma center. Patients greater than or equal to 18 years of age requiring procedural sedation and analgesia were eligible, and enrolled patients received 0.07 mg/kg of intravenous midazolam followed by 2 mg/kg of intravenous ketamine. Vital signs were recorded at regular intervals. The adequacy of sedation, adverse effects, patient satisfaction, and time to reach discharge alertness were determined. Descriptive statistics were calculated using statistical analysis software. Results: Seventy-seven patients were enrolled. Three were excluded due to protocol violations, three due to lack of documentation, and one due to subcutaneous infiltration of ketamine, leaving 70 patients for analysis. The average age was 31 years, and 41 (59%) were female. Indications for procedural sedation and analgesia included abscess incision and drainage (66%), fracture/joint reduction (26%), and other (8%). The mean dose of midazolam was 5.6 +/- 1.4 mg and the mean dose of ketamine was 159 +/- 42 mg. The mean time to achieve discharge criteria was 64 +/- 24 minutes. Five patients experienced mild emergence reactions, but there were no episodes of hallucinations, delirium, or other serious emergence reactions. Eighteen (25%) patients recalled dreaming while sedated; twelve (17%) were described as pleasant, two (3%) unpleasant, three (4%) both pleasant and unpleasant, and one (1%) neither pleasant nor unpleasant. There were four (6%) cases of respiratory compromise, two (3%) episodes of emesis, and one (1% )case of myoclonia. All of these were transient and did not result in a change in the patient's disposition. Only one (1%) patient indicated that she was not satisfied with the sedation regimen. Conclusions: The combination of midazolam and ketamine provides effective procedural sedation and analgesia in adult ED patients, and appears to be safe.
引用
收藏
页码:228 / 235
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[21]   HEMODYNAMIC STUDIES DURING INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA FOR OPEN-HEART SURGERY USING DIAZEPAM AND KETAMINE [J].
JACKSON, APF ;
DHADPHALE, PR ;
CALLAGHAN, ML ;
ALSERI, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1978, 50 (04) :375-378
[22]  
JAGO RH, 1983, ANAESTHESIA, V38, P438, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1983.tb14026.x
[23]  
KOTHARY SP, 1977, CLIN PHARMACOL THER, V21, P108
[24]  
KUMAR SM, 1980, CLIN THER, V3, P43
[25]   A prospective evaluation of the safety and efficacy of methohexital in the emergency department [J].
Lerman, B ;
Yoshida, D ;
Levitt, MA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1996, 14 (04) :351-354
[26]  
LILBURN JK, 1976, BRIT J ANAESTH, V48, P1125
[27]   KETAMINE SEQUELAE - EVALUATION OF ABILITY OF VARIOUS PREMEDICANTS TO ATTENUATE ITS PSYCHIC ACTIONS [J].
LILBURN, JK ;
DUNDEE, JW ;
NAIR, SG ;
FEE, JPH ;
JOHNSTON, HML .
ANAESTHESIA, 1978, 33 (04) :307-311
[28]  
MATTILA MAK, 1979, ANAESTHESIST, V28, P20
[29]   KETAMINE AS SOLE ANAESTHETIC AGENT FOR MINOR SURGICAL PROCEDURES [J].
MORGAN, M ;
LOH, L ;
SINGER, L ;
MOORE, PH .
ANAESTHESIA, 1971, 26 (02) :158-&
[30]  
OXORN D, 1994, ANESTH ANALG, V79, P553