Current and future approaches to inhibitor management and aversion

被引:16
作者
Hay, Charles
Recht, Michael
Carcao, Manuel
Reipert, Birgit
机构
[1] Manchester Royal Infirm, Dept Clin Haematol, Manchester M13 9WL, Lancs, England
[2] Phoenix Childrens Hosp, Phoenix, AZ USA
[3] Hosp Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
[4] Baxter BioSci, Vienna, Austria
关键词
immune tolerance induction (ITI); immunosuppressive therapy; rituximab; congenital hemophilia; gene therapy;
D O I
10.1055/s-2006-946910
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the most common approach used to eliminate inhibitors that develop in hemophilia A patients following exposure to factor (F) VIII therapy. ITI generally requires ongoing long-term exposure to factor replacement therapy using FVIII or FIX. Although plasma-derived products have been the mainstay of ITI therapy in the past, recent data indicate that high-purity (i.e., recombinant) rFVIII products are probably equally effective. For patients who have failed to respond to ITI treatment, or for those at high risk to do so, immunosuppressive therapy may be helpful. Rituximab has demonstrated a possible clinical benefit in hemophilic and nonhemophilic patients developing FVIII inhibitors, but benefit in those with congenital hemophilia and inhibitors has not been established and more extensive clinical studies are needed. More recently, research on reducing the incidence of inhibitor development has included mutagenizing key epitopes of the FVIII antigenic molecule to alter its immunogenicity without affecting biological activity, as well as induction of tolerance by gene therapy with immunodominant A2 and C2 domains of FVIII presented by B cells as immunoglobulin fusion proteins.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 21
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Treating haemophilia A with recombinant blood factors: a comparison [J].
Ananyeva, N ;
Khrenov, A ;
Darr, F ;
Summers, R ;
Sarafanov, A ;
Saenko, E .
EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2004, 5 (05) :1061-1070
[2]  
BORELDERLON A, 2004, HAEMOPHILIA S3, V10, P53
[3]   Cost-utility analysis in evaluating prophylaxis in haemophilia [J].
Carcao, M ;
Ungar, WJ ;
Feldman, BM .
HAEMOPHILIA, 2004, 10 :50-57
[4]  
DiMichele DM, 2002, THROMB HAEMOSTASIS, V87, P52
[5]   The therapeutic potential of anti-CD20 - What do B-cells do? [J].
Eisenberg, R ;
Looney, RJ .
CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2005, 117 (03) :207-213
[6]   High-dose factor VIII inhibits factor VIII-specific memory B cells in hemophilia A with factor VIII inhibitors [J].
Hausl, C ;
Ahmad, RU ;
Sasgary, M ;
Doering, CB ;
Lollar, P ;
Richter, G ;
Schwarz, HP ;
Turecek, PL ;
Reipert, BM .
BLOOD, 2005, 106 (10) :3415-3422
[7]   Preventing restimulation of memory B cells in hemophilia A: a potential new strategy for the treatment of antibody-dependent immune disorders [J].
Hausl, C ;
Ahmad, RU ;
Schwarz, HP ;
Muchitsch, EM ;
Turecek, PL ;
Dorner, F ;
Reipert, BM .
BLOOD, 2004, 104 (01) :115-122
[8]  
Hay CRM, 1996, BLOOD COAGUL FIBRIN, V7, pS15
[9]   Ablation of hemophillic FVIII inhibitors with FVIII priming, cyclophosphamide immune suppression, and rapid tapering of FVIII immune tolerance [J].
Kobrinsky, NL ;
Sjolander, DE ;
Moser, DK ;
Stegman, DA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, 2004, 76 (02) :180-184
[10]   Comparison of the International Immune Tolerance Registry and the North American Immune Tolerance Registry [J].
Kroner, BL .
VOX SANGUINIS, 1999, 77 :33-37