An Efficiency Evaluation of the EU's Allocation of Carbon Emission Allowances

被引:64
作者
Chiu, Y. -H. [1 ]
Lin, J. -C. [2 ]
Su, W. -N. [3 ]
Liu, J. -K. [4 ]
机构
[1] Soochow Univ, Dept Econ, Taipei 100, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, Grad Inst Appl Sci & Technol, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Soochow Univ, Taipei 100, Taiwan
关键词
zero sum game; efficiency; DEA; emission allowance; energy; POLICY; DIFFERENTIATION; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1080/15567249.2010.527900
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The allocation of carbon dioxide emission allowances has become one of the most important global issues. The main argument is the equity in the allocation of emission allowances. If the allocation is unfair, then economic development of some countries will be impeded. Therefore, to promote an emissions trading system, an equitable and reasonable allocation method that benefits every participant country is needed, so that countries will accept and implement the system accordingly. This study uses emission allowance as an input variable for evaluation and analysis. The output variables are energy consumption, government spending, and gross domestic product, based on the model developed by Gomes and Lins (2008). The study takes the zero sum game data envelopment analysis model to explore the allocation of emission allowances and the reallocation of emission allowances among 24 European Union members, hoping to find a comparatively fair and efficient allocation method for them. The empirical results show that first, the current allocation of emission allowances is inefficient. Second, after reallocation, those countries which implemented it most efficiently have more allowances. andThird, after the reallocation, G8 countries including the United Kingdom, France, and Italy have higher allowances than their initial allowences, implying that industrialized countries need more allowances to maintain their economic growth.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 200
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], DIFFERENTATION DYNAM
[2]  
[Anonymous], OPTIONS POST2012 EU
[3]  
[Anonymous], DP0131 RES FUT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, STATE TRENDS CARBON
[5]   SOME MODELS FOR ESTIMATING TECHNICAL AND SCALE INEFFICIENCIES IN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS [J].
BANKER, RD ;
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1984, 30 (09) :1078-1092
[6]   Options for differentiation of future commitments in climate policy: how to realise timely participation to meet stringent climate goals? [J].
Berk, Marcel M. ;
den Elzen, Michel G. J. .
CLIMATE POLICY, 2001, 1 (04) :465-480
[7]   Implementing greenhouse gas trading in Europe: lessons from economic literature and international experiences [J].
Boemare, C ;
Quirion, P .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 43 (2-3) :213-230
[8]   MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) :429-444
[9]   THE PROBLEM OF SOCIAL COST [J].
COASE, RH .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1960, 3 (OCT) :1-44
[10]  
Dales J. H., 1968, Pollution, Property. and Prices