Curtailing deception: The impact of direct questions on lies and omissions

被引:104
作者
Schweitzer, ME [1 ]
Croson, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1108/eb022825
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the use of deception in two negotiation studies. Study 1 (N = 80) demonstrates that direct questions and solidarity curtail deception. Study 2 (N = 74 dyads) demonstrates that direct questions are particularly effective in curtailing lies of omission, but may actually increase the incidence of lies of commission These findings highlight the importance of misrepresentation to the negotiation process and suggest approaches for contending with deception.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 248
页数:24
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
ANDERSON D, IN PRESS SOCIAL CONT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, ESSENTIALS NEGOTIATI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, SOC JUSTICE RES, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02197657
[4]  
Anton R.J., 1990, Int. J. Confl. Manag., V1, P265
[6]  
Bok S, 1978, Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life, V1st
[7]  
Brown Roger., 1965, SOC PSYCHOL-GERMANY
[8]   LOOKING AND COMPETING - ACCOUNTABILITY AND VISUAL ACCESS IN INTEGRATIVE BARGAINING [J].
CARNEVALE, PJD ;
PRUITT, DG ;
SEILHEIMER, SD .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 40 (01) :111-120
[9]   THE INFLUENCE OF POSITIVE AFFECT AND VISUAL ACCESS ON THE DISCOVERY OF INTEGRATIVE SOLUTIONS IN BILATERAL NEGOTIATION [J].
CARNEVALE, PJD ;
ISEN, AM .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1986, 37 (01) :1-13
[10]  
CARR AZ, 1968, HARVARD BUS REV, V46, P143