Comparison of pesticide leaching models:: results using the Weiherbach data set

被引:23
作者
Gottesbüren, B
Aden, K
Bärlund, I
Brown, C
Dust, M
Görlitz, G
Jarvis, N
Rekolainen, S
Schäfer, H
机构
[1] BASF AG, Agr Ctr Limburgerhof, D-67114 Limburgerhof, Germany
[2] Finnish Environm Inst, FIN-00251 Helsinki, Finland
[3] Cranfield Univ, Soil Survey & Land Res Ctr, Bedford MK45 4DT, England
[4] Forschungszentrum Julich, Inst Radioagron, D-52425 Julich, Germany
[5] Hoechst Schering AgrEvo GmbH, Hoechst Works, D-65926 Frankfurt, Germany
[6] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Soil Sci, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[7] Bayer AG, Pflanzenschutzzentrum Monheim, D-51368 Leverkusen, Germany
关键词
simulation models; herbicide; tracer; leaching; calibration; validation; soil;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-3774(99)00090-6
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The leaching of the herbicide isoproturon and the water tracer bromide in the profile of a silty loam soil at the Weiherbach Catchment area in Germany was simulated by eight different persons using the models MACRO, SIMULAT, LEACHP, WAVE, GLEAMS and PELMO (only bromide). Experimental results from different laboratory studies and from a field study were available to parameterise the models. Model results concerning water contents, tracer and pesticide profiles were provided for two different test periods in the field (winter and spring). The results for the behaviour of the herbicide and the tracer in the field study in spring were not known beforehand to the model users. Therefore this is considered to be a blind test. After the model users had estimated the parameters and presented the modelling results a consensus parameter set was provided by the data set co-ordinator to reduce the subjective influence of individual users and to identify the effect of different model concepts. The most striking points of the modelling exercise were the diversity of parameters estimated by different modellers from the same basic data set and the problems of simulating the field behaviour using laboratory derived pesticide parameters. An overwhelming influence of the individual users on the model results was remarkable for the Weiherbach data set. It was not possible to estimate, from the laboratory data, alone a parameter combination suitable for describing the field behaviour of isoproturon satisfactorily. The use of Literature data or calibration to the field results of the winter period did improve the simulation results significantly. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 181
页数:29
相关论文
共 16 条
[11]  
MULLINS JA, 1993, EPA600R93046
[12]   Simulation of soil water, bromide and pesticide behaviour in soil with the GLEAMS model [J].
Rekolainen, S ;
Gouy, V ;
Francaviglia, R ;
Eklo, OM ;
Bärlund, I .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2000, 44 (1-3) :201-224
[13]   The Weiherbach data set:: An experimental data set for pesticide model testing on the field scale [J].
Schierholz, I ;
Schäfer, D ;
Kolle, O .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2000, 44 (1-3) :43-61
[14]   A European test of pesticide-leaching models:: methodology and major recommendations [J].
Vanclooster, M ;
Boesten, JJTI ;
Trevisan, M ;
Brown, CD ;
Capri, E ;
Eklo, OM ;
Gottesbüren, B ;
Gouy, V ;
van der Linden, AMA .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2000, 44 (1-3) :1-19
[15]   Evaluation of pesticide dynamics of the WAVE-model [J].
Vanclooster, M ;
Ducheyne, S ;
Dust, M ;
Vereecken, H .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2000, 44 (1-3) :371-388
[16]   A CLOSED-FORM EQUATION FOR PREDICTING THE HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY OF UNSATURATED SOILS [J].
VANGENUCHTEN, MT .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1980, 44 (05) :892-898