Loopy proteins appear conserved in evolution

被引:153
作者
Liu, JF
Tan, HP
Rost, B
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Dept Biochem & Mol Biophys, NE Struct Genom Consortium, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Pharmacol, New York, NY 10032 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Ctr Computat Biol & Bioinformat C2B2, New York, NY 10032 USA
关键词
disordered regions; protein function; protein-protein interactions; natively unstructured proteins; regular secondary structure;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00736-2
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Over the last decade, structural biologists have unravelled many proteins that appear natively disordered. Common assumptions are that many of these proteins adopt structure through binding and that the structural flexibility enables them to adopt different functions. Here, we investigated regions of more than 70 sequence-consecutive residues that have no regular secondary structure (NORS). Analysing 31 entirely sequenced organisms, we predicted five times as many proteins with NORS regions (loopy proteins) in eukaryotes (20%) than in prokaryotes and archaeas (4%). Thousands of these NORS regions were over 150 residues long. The amino acid composition of NORS regions differed from that of loops in PDB. Although NORS proteins had significantly more residues in low-complexity regions than other proteins, simple cut-off thresholds for sequence bias missed most NORS regions. On average, NORS regions were evolutionarily at least as conserved as their flanking regions. Furthermore, yeast proteins with NORS regions had more protein-protein interaction partners than other proteins. Regulatory and transcription-related functions were over-represented in loopy proteins, biosynthesis and energy metabolism were under-represented. Overall, our analysis confirmed that proteins with non-regular structures appear to play important functional roles, and they may adopt as yet unknown types of protein structures. (C) 2002 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 64
页数:12
相关论文
共 109 条
[11]   Structural genomics: an overview [J].
Blundell, TL ;
Mizuguchi, K .
PROGRESS IN BIOPHYSICS & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2000, 73 (05) :289-295
[12]  
Bon E, 2000, YEAST, V16, P1229, DOI 10.1002/1097-0061(20000930)16:13<1229::AID-YEA618>3.0.CO
[13]  
2-Q
[14]  
Bork P, 1996, METHOD ENZYMOL, V266, P162
[15]   Crystal structure of formate dehydrogenase H: Catalysis involving Mo, molybdopterin, selenocysteine, and an Fe4S4 cluster [J].
Boyington, JC ;
Gladyshev, VN ;
Khangulov, SV ;
Stadtman, TC ;
Sun, PD .
SCIENCE, 1997, 275 (5304) :1305-1308
[16]   Structural genomics: beyond the Human Genome Project [J].
Burley, SK ;
Almo, SC ;
Bonanno, JB ;
Capel, M ;
Chance, MR ;
Gaasterland, T ;
Lin, DW ;
Sali, A ;
Studier, FW ;
Swaminathan, S .
NATURE GENETICS, 1999, 23 (02) :151-157
[17]  
Chabrière E, 1999, NAT STRUCT BIOL, V6, P182
[18]   FlexE: Efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations [J].
Claussen, H ;
Buning, C ;
Rarey, M ;
Lengauer, T .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2001, 308 (02) :377-395
[19]  
Devos D, 2000, PROTEINS, V41, P98, DOI 10.1002/1097-0134(20001001)41:1<98::AID-PROT120>3.0.CO
[20]  
2-S