The new liver allocation system: Moving toward evidence-based transplantation policy

被引:565
作者
Freeman, RB
Wiesner, RH
Harper, A
McDiarmid, SV
Lake, J
Edwards, E
Merion, R
Wolfe, R
Turcotte, J
Teperman, L
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, New England Med Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Surg,Div Transplant Surg, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Dept Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] United Network Organ Sharing, Richmond, VA USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Pediat, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[5] Univ Minnesota, Dept Med, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Dept Surg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[7] Univ Michigan, Dept Biostat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[8] Sci Registry Transplant Recipients, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[9] NYU, Dept Surg, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1053/jlts.2002.35927
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
In 1999, the Institute of Medicine suggested that instituting a continuous disease severity score that de-emphasizes waiting time could improve the allocation of cadaveric livers for transplantation. This report describes the development and initial implementation of this new plan. The goal was to develop a continuous disease severity scale that uses objective, readily available variables to predict mortality risk in patients with end-stage liver disease and reduce the emphasis on waiting time. Mechanisms were also developed for inclusion of good transplant candidates who do not have high risk of death but for whom transplantation may be urgent. The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) and Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease (PELD) scores were selected as the basis for the new allocation policy because of their high degree of accuracy for predicting death in patients having a variety of liver disease etiologies and across a broad spectrum of liver disease severity. Except for the most urgent patients, all patients will be ranked continuously under the new policy by their MELD/PELD score. Waiting time is used only to prioritize patients with identical MELD/PELD scores. Patients who are not well served by the MELD/PELD scores can be prioritized through a regionalized peer review system. This new liver allocation plan is based on more objective, verifiable measures of disease severity with minimal emphasis on waiting time. Application of such risk models provides an evidenced-based approach on which to base further refinements and improve the model.
引用
收藏
页码:851 / 858
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[11]  
Kane R, 2001, TRANSPLANTATION, V72, P463
[12]   Hepatopulmonary syndrome with progressive hypoxemia as an indication for liver transplantation: Case reports and literature review [J].
Krowka, MJ ;
Porayko, MK ;
Plevak, DJ ;
Pappas, SC ;
Steers, JL ;
Krom, RAF ;
Wiesner, RH .
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 1997, 72 (01) :44-53
[13]   Hepatopulmonary syndrome: Recent literature (1997 to 1999) and implications for liver transplantation [J].
Krowka, MJ .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 6 (04) :S31-S35
[14]   Intention-to-treat analysis of surgical treatment for early hepatocellular carcinoma: Resection versus transplantation [J].
Llovet, JM ;
Fuster, J ;
Bruix, J .
HEPATOLOGY, 1999, 30 (06) :1434-1440
[15]  
LOVELET JM, 2000, HEPATOLOGY, V31, P1019
[16]   A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts [J].
Malinchoc, M ;
Kamath, PS ;
Gordon, FD ;
Peine, CJ ;
Rank, J ;
ter Borg, PCJ .
HEPATOLOGY, 2000, 31 (04) :864-871
[17]  
MANJO PE, 2000, HEPATOLOGY, V31, P899
[18]  
MILLIKAN WJ, 1985, ANN SURG, V201, P712
[19]   MELD and PELD: Application of survival models to liver allocation [J].
Wiesner, RH ;
McDiarmid, SV ;
Kamath, PS ;
Edwards, EB ;
Malinchoc, M ;
Kremers, WK ;
Krom, RAF ;
Kim, WR .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 7 (07) :567-580
[20]  
WOLFE R, ANAL DATA REQUEST OP