Effects of acetic acid on the kinetics of xylose fermentation by an engineered, xylose-isomerase-based Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain

被引:113
作者
Bellissimi, Eleonora [1 ,2 ]
van Dijken, Johannes P. [3 ]
Pronk, Jack T. [1 ,2 ]
van Maris, Antonius J. A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Biotechnol, NL-2628 BC Delft, Netherlands
[2] Kluyver Ctr Genom Ind Fermentat, Delft, Netherlands
[3] Bird Engn BV, Schiedam, Netherlands
关键词
Saccharomyces cerevisiae; xylose; acetic acid; lignocellulose; stress; xylose isomerase; XYLITOL DEHYDROGENASE; BUFFERING CAPACITY; ETHANOL; GROWTH; LIGNOCELLULOSE; INHIBITION; GLUCOSE; YEASTS; ADAPTATION; RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1567-1364.2009.00487.x
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Acetic acid, an inhibitor released during hydrolysis of lignocellulosic feedstocks, has previously been shown to negatively affect the kinetics and stoichiometry of sugar fermentation by (engineered) Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. This study investigates the effects of acetic acid on S. cerevisiae RWB 218, an engineered xylose-fermenting strain based on the Piromyces XylA (xylose isomerase) gene. Anaerobic batch cultures on synthetic medium supplemented with glucose-xylose mixtures were grown at pH 5 and 3.5, with and without addition of 3 g L-1 acetic acid. In these cultures, consumption of the sugar mixtures followed a diauxic pattern. At pH 5, acetic acid addition caused increased glucose consumption rates, whereas specific xylose consumption rates were not significantly affected. In contrast, at pH 3.5 acetic acid had a strong and specific negative impact on xylose consumption rates, which, after glucose depletion, slowed down dramatically, leaving 50% of the xylose unused after 48 h of fermentation. Xylitol production was absent (< 0.10 g L-1) in all cultures. Xylose fermentation in acetic -acid-stressed cultures at pH 3.5 could be restored by applying a continuous, limiting glucose feed, consistent with a key role of ATP regeneration in acetic acid tolerance.
引用
收藏
页码:358 / 364
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Buffering capacity of whole corn mash alters concentrations of organic acids required to inhibit growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and ethanol production [J].
Abbott, DA ;
Ingledew, WM .
BIOTECHNOLOGY LETTERS, 2004, 26 (16) :1313-1316
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, PEDIATR DERMATOL, DOI DOI 10.1046/J.1525-1470.2001.1862020A.X
[3]   Conversion of paper sludge to ethanol. I: Impact of feeding frequency and mixing energy characterization [J].
Fan, Zhiliang ;
Lynd, Lee R. .
BIOPROCESS AND BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2007, 30 (01) :27-34
[4]   Effect of pH and lactic or acetic acid on ethanol productivity by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in corn mash [J].
Graves, Tara ;
Narendranath, Neelakantam V. ;
Dawson, Karl ;
Power, Ronan .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2006, 33 (06) :469-474
[5]  
Hahn-Hagerdal B, 2001, Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol, V73, P53
[6]   ETHANOLIC FERMENTATION OF PENTOSES IN LIGNOCELLULOSE HYDROLYSATES [J].
HAHNHAGERDAL, B ;
LINDEN, T ;
SENAC, T ;
SKOOG, K .
APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1991, 28-9 :131-144
[7]   Effect of inhibitory compounds found in biomass hydrolysates on growth and xylose fermentation by a genetically engineered strain of S-cerevisiae [J].
Helle, S ;
Cameron, D ;
Lam, J ;
White, B ;
Duff, S .
ENZYME AND MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 33 (06) :786-792
[8]   Xylose fermentation by genetically modified Saccharomyces cerevisiae 259ST in spent sulfite liquor [J].
Helle, SS ;
Murray, A ;
Lam, J ;
Cameron, DR ;
Duff, SJB .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 92 (02) :163-171
[9]   Comparison of the xylose reductase-xylitol dehydrogenase and the xylose isomerase pathways for xylose fermentation by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae [J].
Karhumaa, Kaisa ;
Garcia Sanchez, Rosa ;
Hahn-Hagerdal, Barbel ;
Gorwa-Grauslund, Marie-F .
MICROBIAL CELL FACTORIES, 2007, 6 (1)
[10]   Tolerance and adaptation of ethanologenic yeasts to lignocellulosic inhibitory compounds [J].
Keating, JD ;
Panganiban, C ;
Mansfield, SD .
BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, 2006, 93 (06) :1196-1206