Similar scaling of contralateral and ipsilateral cortical responses during graded unimanual force generation

被引:81
作者
Derosiere, G. [1 ,2 ]
Alexandre, F. [1 ]
Bourdillon, N. [1 ]
Mandrick, K. [1 ,3 ]
Ward, T. E. [2 ]
Perrey, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montpellier I, Movement Hlth M2H, EuroMov, F-34090 Montpellier, France
[2] NUIM, BERG, Maynooth, Co Kildare, Ireland
[3] Bodysens, F-30035 Nimes, France
关键词
NIRS; Cortical activation; Muscle force; Ipsilateral; Handgrip; Unimanual task; NEAR-INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; HUMAN BRAIN ACTIVATION; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; CEREBRAL-BLOOD-FLOW; OXYGENATION CHANGES; FUNCTIONAL MRI; HAND; MOVEMENTS; MUSCLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.006
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Hemibody movements are strongly considered as being under the control of the contralateral hemisphere of the cerebral cortex. However, some neuroimaging studies have found a bilateral activation of either the primary sensori-motor (SM1) areas or the rostral prefrontal cortex (PFC), during unimanual tasks. More than just bilateral, the activation of these areas was found to be symmetrical in some studies. However, the symmetrical response remains strongly controversial notably for handgrip force generations. We therefore aimed to examine the bilateral SM1 and rostral PFC area activations in response to graded submaximal force generation during a unilateral handgrip task. Fifteen healthy subjects performed 6 levels of force (ranging from 5 to 50% of MVC) during a handgrip task. We concomitantly measured the activation of bilateral SM1 and rostral PFC areas through near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and the electromyographic (EMG) activity of the bilateral flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) muscles. Symmetrical activation was found over the SM1 areas for all the investigated levels of force. At the highest level of force (i.e., 50% of MVC), the EMG of the passive FDS increased significantly and the ipsilateral rostral PFC activation was found more intense than the corresponding contralateral rostral PFC activation. We suggest that the visuo-guided control of force levels during a handgrip task requires the cross-talk from ipsi- to contralateral SM1 to cope for the relative complexity of the task, similar to that which occurs during complex sequential finger movement. We also propose alternative explanations for the observed symmetrical SM1 activation including (i) the ipsilateral corticospinal tract and (ii) interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) mechanism. The increase in EMG activity over the passive FDS could be associated with a release of IHI at 50% of MVC. Finally, our results suggest that the greater ipsilateral (right) rostral PFC activation may reflect the greater demand of attention required to control the motor output at high levels of force. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:471 / 477
页数:7
相关论文
共 62 条
[31]  
Kuypers H.G.J.M., 1985, SCI BASIS CLIN NEURO, P3
[32]  
Lee M, 2000, ANN NEUROL, V47, P606, DOI 10.1002/1531-8249(200005)47:5<606::AID-ANA8>3.3.CO
[33]  
2-C
[34]   Inhibition of ipsilateral motor cortex during phasic generation of low force [J].
Liepert, J ;
Dettmers, C ;
Terborg, C ;
Weiller, C .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 112 (01) :114-121
[35]   Human brain activation during sustained and intermittent submaximal fatigue muscle contractions: An fMRI study [J].
Liu, JZ ;
Shan, ZY ;
Zhang, LD ;
Sahgal, V ;
Brown, RW ;
Yue, GH .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 90 (01) :300-312
[36]  
Ludman CN, 1996, NMR BIOMED, V9, P228, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1492(199608)9:5<228::AID-NBM420>3.0.CO
[37]  
2-1
[38]   An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function [J].
Miller, EK ;
Cohen, JD .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 24 :167-202
[39]   Force level modulates human cortical oscillatory activities [J].
Mima, T ;
Simpkins, N ;
Oluwatimilehin, T ;
Hallett, M .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 1999, 275 (02) :77-80
[40]   The role of cocontraction in the impairment of movement accuracy with fatigue [J].
Missenard, Olivier ;
Mottet, Denis ;
Perrey, Stephane .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2008, 185 (01) :151-156