Sources and remediation for mercury contamination in aquatic systems - a literature review

被引:606
作者
Wang, QR
Kim, D
Dionysiou, DD
Sorial, GA
Timberlake, D
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
[2] US EPA, Natl Risk Management Res Lab, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA
关键词
mercury; aquatic systems; remedial; sources; contamination; sediment; capping; dredging; natural attentuation; modeling;
D O I
10.1016/j.envpol.2004.01.010
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sources of mercury contamination in aquatic systems were studied in a comprehensive literature review. The results show that the most important anthropogenic sources of mercury pollution in aquatic systems are: (1) atmospheric deposition, (2) erosion, (3) urban discharges. (4) agricultural materials, (5) mining, and (6) combustion and industrial discharges. Capping and dredging are two possible remedial approaches to mercury contamination in aquatic systems, and natural attenuation is a passive decontamination alternative. Capping seems to be an economical and effective remedial approach to mercury-contaminated aquatic systems. Dredging is an expensive remedial approach. However, for heavily polluted systems, dredging may be more effective. Natural attenuation, involving little or no cost, is a possible and very economical choice for less contaminated sites. Proper risk assessment is necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of remedial and passive decontamination methods as well as their potential adverse environmental effects. Modeling tools have a bright future in the remediation and passive decontamination of mercury contamination in aquatic systems. Existing mercury transport and transformation models were reviewed and compared. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 336
页数:14
相关论文
共 125 条
[81]  
Meili M, 1997, MET IONS BIOL SYST, V34, P21
[82]   THE FATE OF HG CONTAMINATED SEDIMENTS OF THE RAVENNA LAGOON (ITALY) - FINAL BURIAL OR POTENTIAL REMOBILIZATION [J].
MISEROCCHI, S ;
LANGONE, L ;
GUERZONI, S .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1993, 28 (8-9) :349-358
[83]   Determination of the environmental impact of consolidation induced convective transport through capped sediment [J].
Moo-Young, H ;
Myers, T ;
Tardy, B ;
Ledbetter, R ;
Vanadit-Ellis, W ;
Sellasie, K .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2001, 85 (1-2) :53-72
[84]   Human and environmental contamination by mercury from industrial uses in Brazil [J].
Moreira, JC ;
Pivetta, F .
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 1997, 97 (3-4) :241-246
[85]   The chemical cycle and bioaccumulation of mercury [J].
Morel, FMM ;
Kraepiel, AML ;
Amyot, M .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1998, 29 :543-566
[86]   Immobilization of heavy metals in sediment dredged from a seaport by iron bearing materials [J].
Muller, I ;
Pluquet, E .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 37 (6-7) :379-386
[87]   Organic enrichment associated with outwash from marine aggregates dredging: A probable explanation for surface sheens and enhanced benthic production in the vicinity of dredging operations [J].
Newell, RC ;
Hitchcock, DR ;
Seiderer, LJ .
MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 1999, 38 (09) :809-818
[88]   EFFECTS OF HOPPER DREDGING AND SEDIMENT DISPERSION, CHESAPEAKE BAY [J].
NICHOLS, M ;
DIAZ, RJ ;
SCHAFFNER, LC .
ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY AND WATER SCIENCES, 1990, 15 (01) :31-43
[89]  
NRIAGU JO, 1990, ENVIRONMENT, V32, P6
[90]   A GLOBAL ASSESSMENT OF NATURAL SOURCES OF ATMOSPHERIC TRACE-METALS [J].
NRIAGU, JO .
NATURE, 1989, 338 (6210) :47-49