Ethanol-conditioned flavor preferences compared with sugar- and fat-conditioned preferences in rats

被引:13
作者
Ackroff, K
Rozental, D
Sclafani, A
机构
[1] CUNY, Brooklyn Coll, Dept Psychol, Brooklyn, NY 11210 USA
[2] CUNY, Grad Sch, Brooklyn, NY 11210 USA
关键词
flavor conditioning; ethanol; gastric infusions; saccharin; sucrose; fructose; corn oil;
D O I
10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.03.011
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Rats can learn to prefer flavors paired with ethanol and various nutrients. The present study examined the relative strengths of flavor preferences conditioned by 5% ethanol and isocaloric solutions of 7.18% sucrose, 7.18% fructose, or 3.26% corn oil. In three experiments, nondeprived rats were trained with different flavored solutions (conditioned stimuli, CS) paired with intragastric (IG) infusions: a CS+E flavor paired with ethanol infusion, a second CS+ paired with a nutrient infusion, and a CS- paired with water infusion. In two-bottle tests, rats strongly preferred a sucrose-paired CS+S over the CS- and over the CS+E. The preference for the CS+E over CS- was weaker. These effects occurred when the rats drank substantially more CS+S than CS+E in training and when training intakes were matched. Similar results were obtained when the nutrient infusion was fructose or corn oil, except that preferences for the CS+F or CS+O over the CS+E were less pronounced than with CS+S. Consistent with the IG results, rats trained to drink flavored sucrose and ethanol solutions preferred the CS+S to CS+E in a flavored water test. These results confirm prior reports of ethanol-conditioned preferences but show that ethanol is less effective than other nutrients at isocaloric concentrations. The marked individual differences in ethanol-conditioned preferences may be related to the impact of the sugar or fat infusions on the reward evaluation of the ethanol-paired flavor. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:699 / 713
页数:15
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   FLAVOR PREFERENCES CONDITIONED BY SUGARS - RATS LEARN TO PREFER GLUCOSE OVER FRUCTOSE [J].
ACKROFF, K ;
SCLAFANI, A .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1991, 50 (04) :815-824
[2]   Flavor quality and ethanol concentration affect ethanol-conditioned flavor preferences [J].
Ackroff, K ;
Sclafani, A .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 2002, 74 (01) :229-240
[3]   Ethanol flavor preference conditioned by intragastric carbohydrate in rats [J].
Ackroff, K ;
Sclafani, A .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 2002, 74 (01) :41-51
[4]   Diabetic rats prefer glucose-paired flavors over fructose-paired flavors [J].
Ackroff, K ;
Sclafani, A ;
Axen, KV .
APPETITE, 1997, 28 (01) :73-83
[5]   Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric fructose and glucose - Differences in reinforcement potency [J].
Ackroff, K ;
Touzani, K ;
Peets, TK ;
Sclafani, A .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2001, 72 (05) :691-703
[6]   Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric infusion of ethanol in rats [J].
Ackroff, K ;
Sclafani, A .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 2001, 68 (02) :327-338
[7]   FLAVOR PREFERENCES CONDITIONED BY INTRAGASTRIC INFUSIONS OF DILUTE POLYCOSE SOLUTIONS [J].
ACKROFF, K ;
SCLAFANI, A .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1994, 55 (05) :957-962
[8]  
ACKROFF K, 1991, PHYSIOL BEHAV, V49, P1049
[9]  
ACKROFF K, IN PRESS APPETITE
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1999, NEURAL METABOLIC CON