Collateral Ligament Laxity in Knees: What Is Normal?

被引:46
作者
Deep, Kamal [1 ]
机构
[1] Golden Jubilee Natl Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Glasgow G81 4DY, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
MENSTRUAL-CYCLE; SEX-DIFFERENCES; ALIGNMENT; ARTHROPLASTY; JOINT; OSTEOARTHRITIS; REPLACEMENT; KINEMATICS; PROSTHESES; STIFFNESS;
D O I
10.1007/s11999-014-3865-6
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
Proper alignment and balancing of soft tissues of the knee are important goals for TKA. Despite standardized techniques, there is no consensus regarding the optimum amount of collateral ligament laxity one should leave at the end of the TKA. I asked (1) what is the collateral laxity in young healthy volunteers, and (2) is there a difference in collateral laxity between males and females. The femorotibial mechanical angle (FTMA) was measured in 314 knees in healthy volunteers aged 19 to 35 years. Subjects with a history of pain, malalignment, dysplasia, or trauma were excluded. Twenty-five knees were excluded because the hip center could not be acquired, and 22 were excluded because of a history of pain and trauma, leaving 267 knees for inclusion in the study. Of these, 155 were from men and 112 were from women. A validated method using a computer navigation system was used to obtain the measurements. A 10-Nm torque was used to stress the knee in varus and valgus at 0A degrees extension and 15A degrees flexion. An independent t-test and ANOVA were applied to the data to calculate any significant difference between groups (p < 0.05). The mean (SD) unstressed supine FTMA was varus of 1.2A degrees (SD, 4A degrees) in 0A degrees extension and varus of 1.2A degrees (SD, 4.4A degrees) in 15A degrees flexion (p = 0.88). On varus torque of 10 Nm, the supine FTMA changed by a mean of 3.1A degrees (SD, 2A degrees) (95% CI, 2.4A degrees-3.8A degrees; p < 0.001) in 0A degrees extension and 6.9A degrees (SD, 2.6A degrees) (95% CI, 6.2A degrees-7.7A degrees; p < 0.001) in 15A degrees flexion. On valgus torque of 10 Nm, the FTMA changed by a mean of 4.6A degrees (SD, 2.2A degrees) (95% CI, 3.9A degrees-5.3A degrees; p < 0.001) in 0A degrees extension and 7.9A degrees (SD, 3.4A degrees) (95% CI, 7.1A degrees-8.7A degrees; p < 0.001) in 15A degrees flexion. The mean unstressed FTMA in 0A degrees extension was varus of 1.7A degrees (SD, 4A degrees) in men and 0.4A degrees (SD, 3.9A degrees) in women (p = 0.01). Differences in collateral ligament laxity were seen between men and women (p < 0.001 for valgus torque and 0.035 for varus torque in 15A degrees flexion). With valgus torque at 0A degrees flexion, the supine FTMA change was valgus of 4.2A degrees (SD, 2.0A degrees) for men and 5.0A degrees (SD, 2.4A degrees) for women, while at 15A degrees flexion the FTMA change was valgus 7.6A degrees (SD, 3.6A degrees) for men and 8.3A degrees (SD, 3.2A degrees) for women With varus torque at 0A degrees flexion, additional varus was -3.0A degrees (SD, 1.8A degrees) for men and -3.3A degrees (SD, 2.2A degrees) for women, while at 15A degrees flexion, varus was -7.0A degrees SD, (2.5A degrees) for men and -6.9A degrees (SD, 2.8A degrees) for women. The collateral laxity in young healthy volunteers was quantified in this study. The collateral ligament laxity is variable in different persons. In addition, ligaments in women are more lax than in men in valgus stress. This study was conducted on young, healthy knees. Whether the findings are applicable to arthritic knees and replaced knees needs additional evaluation. However the findings provide a baseline from which to work in the evaluation of arthritic knees and in the case of TKA.
引用
收藏
页码:3426 / 3431
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]
The effect of component malalignment on the clinical and radiological outcome of the Kinemax total knee replacement [J].
Bankes, MJK ;
Back, DL ;
Cannon, SR ;
Briggs, TWR .
KNEE, 2003, 10 (01) :55-60
[2]
BARGREN JH, 1983, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P178
[3]
Alignment in total knee arthroplasty -: A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique [J].
Bäthis, H ;
Perlick, L ;
Tingart, M ;
Lüring, C ;
Zurakowski, D ;
Grifka, J .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2004, 86B (05) :682-687
[4]
The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: Is Neutral Mechanical Alignment Normal for All Patients?: The Concept of Constitutional Varus [J].
Bellemans, Johan ;
Colyn, William ;
Vandenneucker, Hilde ;
Victor, Jan .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2012, 470 (01) :45-53
[5]
Patient Satisfaction after Total Knee Arthroplasty Who is Satisfied and Who is Not? [J].
Bourne, Robert B. ;
Chesworth, Bert M. ;
Davis, Aileen M. ;
Mahomed, Nizar N. ;
Charron, Kory D. J. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2010, 468 (01) :57-63
[6]
The whole leg radiograph - Standing versus supine for determining axial alignment [J].
Brouwer, RW ;
Jakma, TSC ;
Bierma-Zeinstra, SMA ;
Ginai, AZ ;
Verhaar, JAN .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 2003, 74 (05) :565-568
[7]
Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique -: A randomised, prospective trial [J].
Chauhan, SK ;
Scott, RG ;
Breidahl, W ;
Beaver, RJ .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2004, 86B (03) :372-377
[8]
Standardising the clinical assessment of coronal knee laxity [J].
Clarke, Jon V. ;
Wilson, William T. ;
Wearing, Scott C. ;
Picard, Frederic ;
Riches, Philip E. ;
Deakin, Angela H. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART H-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE, 2012, 226 (H9) :699-708
[9]
Non-invasive computer-assisted measurement of knee alignment [J].
Clarke, Jon V. ;
Riches, Philip E. ;
Picard, Frederic ;
Deakin, Angela H. .
COMPUTER AIDED SURGERY, 2012, 17 (01) :29-39
[10]
Varus-Valgus Laxity and Passive Stiffness in Medial Knee Osteoarthritis [J].
Creaby, Mark W. ;
Wrigley, Tim V. ;
Lim, Boon Whatt ;
Bowles, Kelly-Ann ;
Metcalf, Ben R. ;
Hinman, Rana S. ;
Bennell, Kim L. .
ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2010, 62 (09) :1237-1243