An audit of a hospital-based Doppler ultrasound quality control protocol using a commercial string Doppler phantom

被引:11
作者
Cournane, S. [1 ]
Fagan, A. J. [2 ]
Browne, J. E. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] St James Hosp, Med Phys & Bioengn Dept, Dublin 8, Ireland
[2] Univ Dublin Trinity Coll, St Jamess Hosp, CAMI, Dublin 2, Ireland
[3] Dublin Inst Technol, IEO, Sch Phys, Dublin, Ireland
[4] Dublin Inst Technol, FOCAS, Dublin, Ireland
来源
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2014年 / 30卷 / 03期
关键词
Ultrasound; Doppler; Quality assurance; String phantom; MOVING TARGET; SYSTEMS; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2013.10.001
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100231 [临床病理学]; 100902 [航空航天医学];
摘要
Results from a four-year audit of a Doppler quality assurance (QA) program using a commercially available Doppler string phantom are presented. The suitability of the phantom was firstly determined and modifications were made to improve the reliability and quality of the measurements. QA of Doppler ultrasound equipment is very important as data obtained from these systems is used in patient management. It was found that if the braided-silk filament of the Doppler phantom was exchanged with an O-ring rubber filament and the velocity range below 50 cm/s was avoided for Doppler quality control (QC) measurements, then the maximum velocity accuracy (MVA) error and intrinsic spectral broadening (ISB) results obtained using this device had a repeatability of 18 +/- 3.3% and 19 +/- 3.5%, respectively. A consistent overestimation of the MVA of between 12% and 56% was found for each of the tested ultrasound systems. Of more concern was the variation of the overestimation within each respective transducer category: MVA errors of the linear, curvilinear and phased array probes were in the range 12.3-20.8%, 32.3-53.8% and 27-0.7%, respectively. There is a dearth of QA data for Doppler ultrasound; it would be beneficial if a multicentre longitudinal study was carried out using the same Doppler ultrasound test object to evaluate sensitivity to deterioration in performance measurements. (C) 2013 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:380 / 384
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]
*AIUM, 2002, PERF CRIT MEAS DOPPL
[2]
Browne J, 2012, PHYS MEDICA, V28, P334
[3]
Validation of a sensitivity performance index test protocol and evaluation of colour Doppler sensitivity for a range of ultrasound scanners [J].
Browne, JE ;
Watson, AJ ;
Hoskins, PR ;
Elliott, AT .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2004, 30 (11) :1475-1483
[4]
THE LEICESTER DOPPLER PHANTOM-A DIGITAL ELECTRONIC PHANTOM FOR ULTRASOUND PULSED DOPPLER SYSTEM TESTING [J].
Gittins, John ;
Martin, Kevin .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 36 (04) :647-655
[5]
GOLDSTEIN A, 1991, J ULTRAS MED, V10, P125
[6]
HOLEN J, 1976, ACTA MED SCAND, V199, P455
[7]
Estimation of blood velocity, volumetric flow and wall shear rate using Doppler ultrasound [J].
Hoskins, Peter R. .
ULTRASOUND, 2011, 19 (03) :120-129
[8]
Accuracy of maximum velocity estimates made using Doppler ultrasound systems [J].
Hoskins, PR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1996, 69 (818) :172-177
[9]
CHOICE OF MOVING TARGET FOR A STRING PHANTOM .2. ON THE PERFORMANCE TESTING OF DOPPLER ULTRASOUND SYSTEMS [J].
HOSKINS, PR .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1994, 20 (08) :781-789
[10]
CHOICE OF MOVING TARGET FOR A STRING PHANTOM .1. MEASUREMENT OF FILAMENT BACKSCATTER CHARACTERISTICS [J].
HOSKINS, PR .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1994, 20 (08) :773-780