Use of single layer small intestinal submucosa for long segment ureteral replacement: A pilot study

被引:36
作者
El-Assmy, A [1 ]
Hafez, AT [1 ]
El-Sherbiny, MT [1 ]
Abd El-Hamid, M [1 ]
Mohsen, T [1 ]
Nour, EM [1 ]
Bazeed, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Mansoura Univ, Urol & Nephrol Ctr, Mansoura, Egypt
关键词
ureter; dogs; transplants; intestine; small;
D O I
10.1097/01.ju.0000121437.94629.ef
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Previous studies have demonstrated successful use of small intestinal submucosa (SIS) as a tube for replacing short segment (11 mm) proximal ureteral defects. However, such small segment ureteral defects could be managed by resection re-anastomosis. We evaluated the use of 1-layer SIS as a tube for the replacement of long segment ureteral defects. Materials and Methods: The ureters of 5 female mongrel dogs were accessed through a median laparotomy incision. A 4 cm segment of mid ureter was resected on the right side. The right ureteral segments were replaced by tubularized SIS segments using 6-zero polydioxanone interrupted sutures. Internal pigtail stents were left for 6 weeks. All animals were sacrificed at 12 weeks. Ureteral patency was assessed by excretory urography and magnetic resonance urography 7 and 12 weeks after the initial procedures. Inflammation and regeneration were assessed histologically. Results: At 12 weeks all ureters on the experimental side were completely occluded with significant hydroureteronephrosis and the subsequent deterioration of kidney function. At autopsy there was failure to calibrate any of the experimental ureters with a 3Fr catheter. Although histologically urothelium and muscular cells had proliferated over the graft, they were embedded in an intense fibrotic and inflammatory process. Conclusions: Technically 1-layer SIS was easily modeled, providing the conditions for watertight anastomosis. The regeneration of urothelium and muscle was induced and supported by the graft. However, functional replacement was not successful. One-layer SIS is not a suitable material for replacing long segment (4 cm) ureteral defects.
引用
收藏
页码:1939 / 1942
页数:4
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   THE USE OF XENOGENEIC SMALL-INTESTINAL SUBMUCOSA AS A BIOMATERIAL FOR ACHILLES-TENDON REPAIR IN A DOG-MODEL [J].
BADYLAK, SF ;
TULLIUS, R ;
KOKINI, K ;
SHELBOURNE, KD ;
KLOOTWYK, T ;
VOYTIK, SL ;
KRAINE, MR ;
SIMMONS, C .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1995, 29 (08) :977-985
[2]   Failure of ureteral replacement with Gore-Tex tube grafts [J].
Baltaci, S ;
Özer, G ;
Özer, E ;
Soygür, T ;
Besalti, Ö ;
Anafarta, K .
UROLOGY, 1998, 51 (03) :400-403
[3]   MALIGNANCIES IN BLADDER AUGMENTATIONS AND INTESTINAL CONDUITS [J].
FILMER, RB ;
SPENCER, JR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1990, 143 (04) :671-678
[4]   URINARY-TRACT PROSTHESES AND THEIR BIOCOMPATIBILITY [J].
HOLMES, SAV ;
KIRBY, RS ;
WHITFIELD, HN .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 71 (04) :378-383
[5]   Ureteral segment replacement using a circumferential small-intestinal submucosa xenogenic graft [J].
Jaffe, JS ;
Ginsberg, PC ;
Yanoshak, SJ ;
Costa, LE ;
Ogbolu, FN ;
Moyer, CP ;
Greene, CH ;
Finkelstein, LH ;
Harkaway, RC .
JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY, 2001, 14 (05) :259-265
[6]   EXPERIMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF SMALL-INTESTINAL SUBMUCOSA AS A BLADDER WALL SUBSTITUTE [J].
KNOPP, BP ;
EPPLEY, BL ;
PREVEL, CD ;
RIPPY, MK ;
HARRUFF, RC ;
BADYLAK, SF ;
ADAMS, MC ;
RINK, RC ;
KEATING, MA .
UROLOGY, 1995, 46 (03) :396-400
[7]  
KROPP BP, 1995, ADV EXP MED BIOL, V385, P229
[8]   Characterization of small intestinal submucosa regenerated canine detrusor: Assessment of reinnervation, in vitro compliance and contractility [J].
Kropp, BP ;
Sawyer, BD ;
Shannon, HE ;
Rippy, MK ;
Badylak, SF ;
Adams, MC ;
Keating, MA ;
Rink, RC ;
Thor, KB .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 156 (02) :599-607
[9]  
Lantz G C, 1993, J Invest Surg, V6, P297, DOI 10.3109/08941939309141619
[10]   Ureteral reconstruction: Small intestine submucosa for the management of strictures and defects of the upper third of the ureter [J].
Liatsikos, EN ;
Dinlenc, CZ ;
Kapoor, R ;
Bernardo, NO ;
Pikhasov, D ;
Anderson, AE ;
Smith, AD .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (05) :1719-1723