Influences on cognitive engagement: Epistemological beliefs and need for closure

被引:82
作者
DeBacker, Teresa K. [1 ]
Crowson, H. Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1348/000709905X53138
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Background. Research indicates that achievement goals influence cognitive engagement, which, in turn, influences academic achievement. We believe that there are other individual difference variables in the realm of personal epistemology that may also directly or indirectly influence cognitive engagement; specifically, epistemological beliefs and epistemological motives (e.g. need for closure). Aims. This study proposed and tested a conceptual model of relationships among epistemological variables (epistemological beliefs and need for closure), achievement goals (mastery, performance-approach, performance-avoidance) and cognitive engagement. Sample. Two hundred and fifty-nine students attending university in the US volunteered to participate in the study. Students represented a variety of academic disciplines and ranged from 15 to 58 years. Methods. The participants completed three paper-and-pencil surveys: the Epistemological Beliefs Inventory; the Attitudes, Beliefs, and Experiences Inventory (a measure of need for closure); and the Approaches to Learning Survey (a measure of achievement goals and cognitive engagement). Results. Structural equation modelling supported the model in general, although not all proposed paths were significant. Correlational analyses further indicated that epistemological beliefs and need for closure are both potentially important variables for understanding learners' treatment of knowledge in instructional settings. Conclusions. There are individual differences in epistemological beliefs and motives that may influence the goals students pursue in learning settings and the nature of their cognitive engagement.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 551
页数:17
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   The relationships among achievement, goal orientation, and study strategies [J].
Al-Emadi, AA .
SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2001, 29 (08) :823-832
[2]   DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE - EVOLVING THEMES AND EMERGING CONCERNS [J].
ALEXANDER, PA .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 1992, 27 (01) :33-51
[3]   ACHIEVEMENT GOALS IN THE CLASSROOM - STUDENTS LEARNING-STRATEGIES AND MOTIVATION PROCESSES [J].
AMES, C ;
ARCHER, J .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 80 (03) :260-267
[4]   MOTIVATION AND STRATEGY USE IN SCIENCE - INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES AND CLASSROOM EFFECTS [J].
ANDERMAN, EM ;
YOUNG, AJ .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 1994, 31 (08) :811-831
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, BEGINNERS GUIDE STRU, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781410610904
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Using Multivariate Statistics
[7]   Epistemic beliefs and moral reasoning [J].
Bendixen, LD ;
Schraw, G ;
Dunkle, ME .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 132 (02) :187-200
[8]   Personal epistemology and theory of mind: deciphering young children's beliefs about knowledge and knowing [J].
Burr, JE ;
Hofer, BK .
NEW IDEAS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 20 (2-3) :199-224
[9]  
Chandler MJ, 2002, PERSONAL EPISTEMOLOGY: THE PSYCHOLOGY OF BELIEFS ABOUT KNOWLEDGE KNOWING, P145
[10]  
Clarebout G., 2001, ED RES EVALUATION, V7, P53, DOI [DOI 10.1076/EDRE.7.1.53.6927, 10.3102/00346543063001001, DOI 10.3102/00346543063001001]