Systematic review of prognostic cohort studies on shoulder disorders

被引:235
作者
Kuijpers, T
van der Windt, DAWM
van der Heijden, GJMG
Bouter, LM
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Inst Res Extramural Med, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Med Ctr, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
musculoskeletal disorders; shoulder; prognosis; systematic review;
D O I
10.1016/j.pain.2004.02.017
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Shoulder complaints are common and have an unfavourable outcome in many patients. Only 50% of all new episodes of shoulder disorders end in complete recovery within 6 months. There is no consensus about prognostic indicators that can identify patients at high and low risk of chronicity. By a systematic search of the literature we identified 16 studies focusing on the prognosis of shoulder disorders. The methodological quality of these 16 studies was assessed. Six of these were considered to be of relatively 'high quality'. There was a wide variety among the studies in length of follow-up, study population, evaluated prognostic factors, type of outcome measure and method of analysis. Due to this large heterogeneity, we refrained from statistical pooling. Instead, we used a best-evidence synthesis. There is strong evidence that high pain intensity predicts a poorer outcome in primary care populations and that middle age (45-54) is associated with poor outcome in occupational populations. There is moderate evidence that a long duration of complaints, and high disability score at baseline predict a poorer outcome in primary care. These results need to be interpreted with caution because of the small number of studies on which these conclusions are based, and the large heterogeneity among studies regarding follow-up, outcome measures, and analysis. (C) 2004 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:420 / 431
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
[31]   Prognostic factors of whiplash-associated disorders: A systematic review of prospective cohort studies [J].
Scholten-Peeters, GGM ;
Verhagen, AP ;
Bekkering, GE ;
van der Windt, DAWM ;
Barnsley, L ;
Oostendorp, RAB ;
Hendriks, EJM .
PAIN, 2003, 104 (1-2) :303-322
[32]   FROZEN SHOULDER - A LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP [J].
SHAFFER, B ;
TIBONE, JE ;
KERLAN, RK .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1992, 74A (05) :738-746
[33]  
Solomon DH, 2001, J RHEUMATOL, V28, P2090
[34]   Shoulder disorders: a state-of-the-art review [J].
van der Heijden, GJMG .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 1999, 13 (02) :287-309
[35]  
vanderWindt DAWM, 1996, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V46, P519
[36]   SHOULDER DISORDERS IN GENERAL-PRACTICE - INCIDENCE, PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS, AND MANAGEMENT [J].
VANDERWINDT, DAWM ;
KOES, BW ;
DEJONG, BA ;
BOUTER, LM .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1995, 54 (12) :959-964
[37]   Predictive validity of symptoms and signs in the neck and shoulders [J].
Viikari-Juntura, E ;
Takala, EP ;
Riihimäki, H ;
Martikainen, R ;
Jäppinen, P .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 53 (08) :800-808
[38]   Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art [J].
Vlaeyen, JWS ;
Linton, SJ .
PAIN, 2000, 85 (03) :317-332
[39]   Comparison of physiotherapy, manipulation, and corticosteroid injection for treating shoulder complaints in general practice: Randomised, single blind study [J].
Winters, JC ;
Sobel, JS ;
Groenier, KH ;
Arendzen, HJ ;
MeyboomdeJong, B .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 314 (7090) :1320-1325