Measurement imprecision in vertebral morphometry of spinal radiographs obtained in the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study: consequences for the identification of prevalent and incident deformities

被引:23
作者
Weber, K
Lunt, M
Gowin, W
Lauermann, T
Armbrecht, G
Wieland, E
Leb, G
O'Neill, T
Felsenberg, D
Reeve, J
机构
[1] Inst Publ Hlth, Cambridge CB2 2SR, England
[2] Graz Univ, Med Klin, A-8036 Graz, Austria
[3] Free Univ Berlin, Klinikum Benjamin Franklin, Abt Radiol & Nukl Med, D-12200 Berlin, Germany
[4] Univ Manchester, ARC, Epidemiol Res Unit, Manchester M13 9PT, Lancs, England
关键词
D O I
10.1259/bjr.72.862.10673947
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Several algorithms are currently in use for evaluating vertebral deformities from plain lateral radiographs of the lumbar and thoracic spine. However, the effects of measurement imprecision as well as uncertainties over image magnification on the correct identification of prevalent and incident vertebral deformities with these algorithms has been little studied. In a pilot study for the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS), plain radiographs were submitted to a single central evaluating centre for measurement of vertebral height from T4 to L4. The thoracic and lumbar spines were imaged on separate films, and we have assessed the precision of measurement of vertebral heights and height ratios. The standard deviation of the differences between films of each of three height measurements ranged from 1.1 to 1.2 mm. A two-stage strategy for identifying incident deformities was devised. This required that the vertebra be a prevalent deformity at the time of the second radiograph and also that at least one of the vertebral ratios should have changed significantly since the first radiograph. The second stage removed all but two of the 18 vertebrae flagged positive in the first stage but not considered to be certain incident fractures by clinical reading of the radiographs.
引用
收藏
页码:957 / 966
页数:10
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Defining incident vertebral deformity: A prospective comparison of several approaches [J].
Black, DM ;
Palermo, L ;
Nevitt, MC ;
Genant, HK ;
Christensen, L ;
Cummings, SR .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 1999, 14 (01) :90-101
[2]  
BLACK DM, 1995, J BONE MINER RES, V10, P890
[3]  
BLACK DM, 1991, J BONE MINER RES, V6, P883
[4]   Randomised trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures [J].
Black, DM ;
Cummings, SR ;
Karpf, DB ;
Cauley, JA ;
Thompson, DE ;
Nevitt, MC ;
Bauer, DC ;
Genant, HK ;
Haskell, WL ;
Marcus, R ;
Ott, SM ;
Torner, JC ;
Quandt, SA ;
Reiss, TF ;
Ensrud, KE .
LANCET, 1996, 348 (9041) :1535-1541
[5]  
Burger H, 1995, Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, V139, P2092
[6]  
EASTELL R, 1991, J BONE MINER RES, V6, P207
[7]   ACCURATE ASSESSMENT OF PRECISION ERRORS - HOW TO MEASURE THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF BONE DENSITOMETRY TECHNIQUES [J].
GLUER, CC ;
BLAKE, G ;
LU, Y ;
BLUNT, BA ;
JERGAS, M ;
GENANT, HK .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 5 (04) :262-270
[8]  
LUNT M, 1998, BONE, V23, pS592
[9]  
McCloskey E. V., 1995, Calcified Tissue International, V56, P491
[10]   THE ASSESSMENT OF VERTEBRAL DEFORMITY - A METHOD FOR USE IN POPULATION STUDIES AND CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
MCCLOSKEY, EV ;
SPECTOR, TD ;
EYRES, KS ;
FERN, ED ;
OROURKE, N ;
VASIKARAN, S ;
KANIS, JA .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1993, 3 (03) :138-147