Factors influencing the exercise behavior of adults with physical disabilities

被引:60
作者
Cardinal, BJ
Kosma, M
McCubbin, JA
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Dept Exercise & Sport Sci, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[2] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Kinesiol, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
关键词
barriers; behavioral; cognitive; processes of change; self-efficacy; transtheoretical model;
D O I
10.1249/01.MSS.0000126568.63402.22
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Purpose: Examine the theorized associations of transtheoretical model (TTM) of behavior change constructs (behavioral and cognitive processes of change, decisional balance, and self-efficacy), along with exercise barriers, by stage of change for exercise behavior among individuals with physical disabilities. Methods: Cross-sectional survey of 322 adults with physical disabilities residing in the United States. Most participants (84.3%) used some form of assistive device (e.g., artificial limb, wheelchair), were female (62.1%), and Caucasian (91.9%). The mean age of participants was 52.5 yr (SD = 13.9). Participants completed and returned questionnaires for each TTM construct, along with an exercise barriers measure. Results: In univariate analyses, all constructs were significantly (P < 0.001) associated with the stages of change for exercise behavior, except for dramatic relief (P > 0.005). The largest portion of variance was derived from counter conditioning (eta(2) = 0.45), followed by the five behavioral processes of change combined (eta(2) = 0.40), self-liberation (eta(2) = 0.31), self-efficacy (eta(2) = 0.30), and self-reevaluation (eta(2) = 0.28). Direct discriminant function (multivariate) analysis revealed four discriminant functions which accounted for 71.0% (P < 0.001), 20.9% (P < 0.001), 6.3% (P < 0.05), and 1.8% (P = 0.62), respectively, of the between-group (stage of change) variability. The overall stage of change classification accuracy was 70.8%. Conclusion: This was the first study to examine the stages of change for exercise behavior among adults with physical disabilities on the basis of the full TTM and exercise barriers. Overall, the results are in general agreement with existing evidence among nondisabled populations. This provides further cross-sectional support for the internal and external validity of TTM and exercise barriers among a unique and understudied population segment.
引用
收藏
页码:868 / 875
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[21]   Stages of change - A critique [J].
Littell, JH ;
Girvin, H .
BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION, 2002, 26 (02) :223-273
[22]   SELF-EFFICACY, DECISION-MAKING, AND STAGES OF CHANGE - AN INTEGRATIVE MODEL OF PHYSICAL EXERCISE [J].
MARCUS, BH ;
EATON, CA ;
ROSSI, JS ;
HARLOW, LL .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 24 (06) :489-508
[23]   THE STAGES AND PROCESSES OF EXERCISE ADOPTION AND MAINTENANCE IN A WORKSITE SAMPLE [J].
MARCUS, BH ;
ROSSI, JS ;
SELBY, VC ;
NIAURA, RS ;
ABRAMS, DB .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 11 (06) :386-395
[24]   MOTIVATIONAL READINESS, SELF-EFFICACY AND DECISION-MAKING FOR EXERCISE [J].
MARCUS, BH ;
OWEN, N .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 22 (01) :3-16
[25]   The transtheoretical model of behavior change: A meta-analysis of applications to physical activity and exercise [J].
Marshall, SJ ;
Biddle, SJH .
ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2001, 23 (04) :229-246
[26]  
Plotnikoff R. C., 2001, Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, V5, P191, DOI 10.1207/S15327841MPEE0504_01
[27]  
Prochaska J. O., 2002, HLTH BEHAV HLTH ED T, V3, P99
[28]   MEASURING PROCESSES OF CHANGE - APPLICATIONS TO THE CESSATION OF SMOKING [J].
PROCHASKA, JO ;
VELICER, WF ;
DICLEMENTE, CC ;
FAVA, J .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 56 (04) :520-528
[29]   What makes a good staging algorithm: Examples from regular exercise [J].
Reed, GR ;
Velicer, WF ;
Prochaska, JO ;
Rossi, JS ;
Marcus, BH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 1997, 12 (01) :57-66
[30]   Health promotion for people with physical, cognitive, and sensory disabilities: An emerging national priority [J].
Rimmer, JH ;
Braddock, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 2002, 16 (04) :220-224