Multiplex interbank networks and systemic importance: An application to European data

被引:94
作者
Aldasoro, Inaki [1 ]
Alves, Ivan [2 ]
机构
[1] Bank Int Settlements, Cent Bahnpl 2, CH-4051 Basel, Switzerland
[2] European Cent Bank, Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
Interbank networks; Systemic importance; Multiplex networks; TOPOLOGY; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfs.2016.12.008
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Research on interbank networks and systemic importance is starting to recognise that the web of exposures linking banks' balance sheets is more complex than the single-layer-of-exposure approach suggests. We use data on exposures between large European banks, broken down by both maturity and instrument type, to characterise the main features of the multiplex (or multi-layered) structure of the network of large European banks. Banks that are well connected or important in one network, tend to also be well connected in other networks (i.e. the network features positively correlated multiplexity). The different layers exhibit a high degree of similarity, stemming both from standard similarity analyses as well as a core-periphery analyses at the layer level. We propose measures of systemic importance that fit the case in which banks are connected through an arbitrary number of layers (be it by instrument, maturity or a combination of both). Such measures allow for a decomposition of the global systemic importance index for any bank into the contributions of each of the sub-networks, providing a potentially useful tool for banking regulators and supervisors in identifying tailored policy responses. We use the dataset of exposures between large European banks to illustrate that both the methodology and the specific level of network aggregation may matter both in the determination of interconnectedness and in the policy making process. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 37
页数:21
相关论文
共 49 条
[11]  
Battiston S., 2015, LEVERAGING NETWORK S
[12]   DebtRank: Too Central to Fail? Financial Networks, the FED and Systemic Risk [J].
Battiston, Stefano ;
Puliga, Michelangelo ;
Kaushik, Rahul ;
Tasca, Paolo ;
Caldarelli, Guido .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2012, 2
[13]  
Bech M.L., 2008, Staff Report No. 354
[14]  
Bluhm M., 2016, 16 DTSCH BUND
[15]  
BONACICH P, 1987, AM J SOCIOL, V92, P1170, DOI 10.1086/228631
[16]   A multiple network approach to corporate governance [J].
Bonacina, Fausto ;
D'Errico, Marco ;
Moretto, Enrico ;
Stefani, Silvana ;
Torriero, Anna ;
Zambruno, Giovanni .
QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2015, 49 (04) :1585-1595
[17]  
Borgatti SP, 1999, SOC NETWORKS, V21, P375
[18]   Network topology of the interbank market [J].
Boss, M ;
Elsinger, H ;
Summer, M ;
Thurner, S .
QUANTITATIVE FINANCE, 2004, 4 (06) :677-684
[19]   Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks [J].
Buldyrev, Sergey V. ;
Parshani, Roni ;
Paul, Gerald ;
Stanley, H. Eugene ;
Havlin, Shlomo .
NATURE, 2010, 464 (7291) :1025-1028
[20]   Static and dynamic networks in interbank markets [J].
Cohen-Cole, Ethan ;
Patacchini, Eleonora ;
Zenou, Yves .
NETWORK SCIENCE, 2015, 3 (01) :98-123