A systematic review of COX-2 inhibitors compared with traditional NSAIDs, or different COX-2 inhibitors for post-operative pain

被引:107
作者
Romsing, J
Moiniche, S
机构
[1] Danish Univ Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Pharmaceut, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Glostrup Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Glostrup, Denmark
关键词
inhibitors cyclooxygenase-2; analgesics anti-inflammatory; non-steroidal; pain post-operative;
D O I
10.1111/j.0001-5172.2004.00379.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: We have reviewed the analgesic efficacy of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors compared with traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), different COX-2 inhibitors, and placebo in post-operative pain. Methods: Randomized controlled trials were evaluated. Outcome measures were pain scores and demand for supplementary analgesia 0-24 h after surgery. Results: Thirty-three studies were included in which four COX-2 inhibitors, rofecoxib 50 mg, celecoxib 200 and 400 mg, parecoxib 20, 40 and 80 mg, and valdecoxib 10, 20, 40, 80 mg were evaluated. Ten of these studies included 18 comparisons of rofecoxib, celecoxib, or parecoxib with NSAIDs. Rofecoxib 50 mg and parecoxib 40 mg provided analgesic efficacy comparable to that of the NSAIDs in the comparisons, and with a longer duration of action after dental surgery but possibly not after major procedures. Celecoxib 200 mg and parecoxib 20 mg provided less effective pain relief. Four studies included five comparisons of rofecoxib 50 mg with celecoxib 200 and 400 mg. Rofecoxib 50 mg provided superior analgesic effect compared with celecoxib 200 mg. Data on celecoxib 400 mg were too sparse for firm conclusions. Thirty-three studies included 62 comparisons of the four COX-2 inhibitors with placebo and the COX-2 inhibitors significantly decreased post-operative pain. Conclusion: Rofecoxib 50 mg and parecoxib 40 mg have an equipotent analgesic efficacy relative to traditional NSAIDs in post-operative pain after minor and major surgical procedures, and after dental surgery these COX-2 inhibitors have a longer duration of action. Besides, rofecoxib 50 mg provides superior analgesic effect compared with celecoxib 200 mg.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 546
页数:22
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
BARDEN J, 2003, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V2
[2]   Oral valdecoxib and injected parecoxib for acute postoperative pain: A quantitative systematic review [J].
Jodie Barden ;
Jayne E Edwards ;
Henry J McQuay ;
R Andrew Moore .
BMC Anesthesiology, 3 (1)
[3]   Single-dose rofecoxib for acute postoperative pain in adults: A quantitative systematic review [J].
Barden J. ;
Edwards J.E. ;
McQuay H.J. ;
Moore R.A. .
BMC Anesthesiology, 2 (1)
[4]   Efficacy and safety of intravenous parecoxib sodium in relieving acute postoperative pain following gynecologic laparotomy surgery [J].
Barton, SF ;
Langeland, FF ;
Snabes, MC ;
LeComte, D ;
Kuss, ME ;
Dhadda, SS ;
Hubbard, RC .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2002, 97 (02) :306-314
[5]   Evaluation of Preoperative administration of the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor rofecoxib for the treatment of postoperative pain after lumbar disc surgery [J].
Bekker, A ;
Cooper, PR ;
Frempong-Boadu, A ;
Babu, R ;
Errico, T ;
Lebovits, A .
NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 50 (05) :1053-1057
[6]   Additive analgesic effect of codeine and paracetamol can be detected in strong, but not moderate, pain after Caesarean section - Baseline pain-intensity is a determinant of assay-sensitivity in a postoperative analgesic trial [J].
Bjune, K ;
Stubhaug, BA ;
Dodgson, MS ;
Breivik, H .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1996, 40 (04) :399-407
[7]  
Camu Frederic, 2002, Am J Ther, V9, P43, DOI 10.1097/00045391-200201000-00009
[8]   Comparison of the analgesic efficacy of rofecoxib and enteric-coated diclofenac sodium in the treatment of postoperative dental pain: A randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial [J].
Chang, DJ ;
Desjardins, PJ ;
Chen, EL ;
Polis, AB ;
McAvoy, M ;
Mockoviak, SH ;
Geba, GP .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2002, 24 (04) :490-503
[9]   Rofecoxib versus codeine/acetaminophen in postoperative dental pain: A double-blind, randomized, placebo- and active comparator-controlled clinical trial [J].
Chang, DJ ;
Fricke, JR ;
Bird, SR ;
Bohidar, NR ;
Dobbins, TW ;
Geba, GP .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2001, 23 (09) :1446-1455
[10]   The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres? [J].
Collins, SL ;
Moore, RA ;
McQuay, HJ .
PAIN, 1997, 72 (1-2) :95-97