Rapid detection of differential item functioning in assessments of health-related quality of life: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy

被引:48
作者
Crane, Paul K.
Gibbons, Laura E.
Narasimhalu, Kaavya
Lai, Jin-Shei
Cella, David
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Harborview Med Ctr, Div Gen Internal Med, Dept Med, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[2] Evanston NW Healthcare, Ctr Outcomes Res & Evaluat, Evanston, IL USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Evanston, IL USA
关键词
differential item functioning; item response theory; ordinal logistic regression; test bias; TURKISH VERSION; RESPONSE THEORY; BREAST-CANCER; MODE; QUESTIONNAIRE; TRANSLATION; VALIDATION; INSTRUMENT; VALIDITY; ANCHOR;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-006-0035-7
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Reason for study: Differential item functioning (DIF) occurs when a test item functions differently in different groups when controlling for the level of the underlying construct measured by the test. DIF assessment is a first step in the evaluation of test bias. We sought to demonstrate a rapid hybrid approach to DIF detection by determining the presence and scale-level impact of DIF related to eight covariates in four domains measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT). Major findings: The number of items found with DIF in each domain depended on the criterion chosen to define the presence of DIF. With a few exceptions, scale-level differential functioning was similar regardless of the criteria chosen. For physical well-being, there was relevant scale-level differential functioning related only to race. For social and family well-being, there was relevant scale-level differential functioning related to each of the covariates. For emotional well-being, there was relevant scale-level differential functioning related to ethnicity, language, and race. For functional well-being, there was relevant scale-level differential functioning related to ethnicity, race, education, and self- vs. interviewer-administration. Principal conclusions: Our rapid hybrid approach to DIF detection may be broadly applicable in other studies of health-related quality of life.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 114
页数:14
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], Stata Statistical Software
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1969, PSYCHMETR MONOGR
[3]   Differential Item Functioning in the Danish translation of the SF-36 [J].
Bjorner, JB ;
Kreiner, S ;
Ware, JE ;
Damsgaard, MT ;
Bech, P .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 51 (11) :1189-1202
[4]   Multilingual translation of the functional assessment of cancer therapy (FACT) quality of life measurement system [J].
Bonomi, AE ;
Cella, DF ;
Hahn, EA ;
Bjordal, K ;
SpernerUnterweger, B ;
Gangeri, L ;
Bergman, B ;
WillemsGroot, J ;
Hanquet, P ;
Zittoun, R .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1996, 5 (03) :309-320
[5]   Effect of administration mode (patient vs physician) and patient's educational level on the Turkish version of the International Prostate Symptom Score [J].
Bozlu, M ;
Doruk, E ;
Akbay, E ;
Ulusoy, E ;
Çayan, S ;
Acar, D ;
Kanik, EA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 9 (08) :417-421
[6]  
Camilli G., 1994, METHODS IDENTIFYING
[7]   Spanish language translation and initial validation of the functional assessment of cancer therapy quality-of-life instrument [J].
Cella, D ;
Hernandez, L ;
Bonomi, AE ;
Corona, M ;
Vaquero, M ;
Shiomoto, G ;
Baez, L .
MEDICAL CARE, 1998, 36 (09) :1407-1418
[8]   Combining anchor and distribution-based methods to derive minimal clinically important differences on the functional assessment of cancer therapy (FACT) anemia and fatigue scales [J].
Cella, D ;
Eton, DT ;
Lai, JS ;
Peterman, AH ;
Merkel, DE .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2002, 24 (06) :547-561
[9]  
Cella D., 1997, MANUAL FUNCTIONAL AS
[10]  
Cella D.F., 1996, Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials