Comparison of the Recovery and G2 Filter as Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filters

被引:24
作者
Cantwell, Colin P. [1 ]
Pennypacker, Jason [1 ]
Singh, Harjit [1 ]
Scorza, Leslie B. [1 ]
Waybill, Peter N. [1 ]
Lynch, Frank C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Milton S Hershey Med Ctr, Inst Heart & Vasc, Hershey, PA USA
关键词
VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM; REPORTING STANDARDS; TRAUMA PATIENTS; EXPERIENCE; PLACEMENT; MIGRATION; TEMPORARY; PATTERNS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvir.2009.05.037
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To compare the technical success of the Recovery and G2 filters as retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Recovery (n = 128) and G2 (n = 113) filters were placed in the IVCs of 241 patients with the intent of retrieval. The referring physician and/or patient were contacted at 6-month intervals to ensure filter retrieval when indicated. The Recovery and G2 filter groups were compared regarding technical success of filter placement, technical success of attempted retrieval, filter tilt, filter migration, filter fracture, and filter efficacy. RESULTS: Filter placement was technically successful in 95% of Recovery filters (n = 122) and 100% of G2 filters (n = 113). Recovery filter retrieval was attempted in 55% of patients (n = 71) at a mean of 228 days (range, 0-838 d) after filter placement. G2 filter retrieval was attempted in 55% of patients (n = 62) at a mean of 230 days (range, 7-617 d) after filter placement. Technical success rates of filter retrieval were 94% (n = 67) and 97% (n = 60) in the Recovery and G2 filter groups, respectively. The G2 filter group had significantly fewer cases of G) filter tilt at placement, (ii) filter tilt at attempted retrieval, and (iii) filter fracture than the Recovery filter group. In the G2 filter group, there was a significantly higher technical success rate of filter placement and there were more cases of caudal filter migration than in the Recovery filter group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the Recovery filter, the G2 filter is associated with significantly less filter fracture and tilt, greater technical success of filter placement, and more caudal filter migration.
引用
收藏
页码:1193 / 1199
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Initial experience in humans with a new retrievable inferior vena cava filter [J].
Asch, MR .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 (03) :835-844
[2]   Changing patterns in the use of inferior vena cava filters: Review of a single center experience [J].
Aziz, Faisal ;
Spate, Kristina ;
Wong, James ;
Aruny, John ;
Sumpio, Bauer .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2007, 205 (04) :564-569
[3]   Retrievability of the recovery vena cava filter after dwell times longer than 180 days [J].
Binkert, CA ;
Sasadeusz, K ;
Stavropoulos, SW .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2006, 17 (02) :299-302
[4]   VENA TECH-LGM FILTER - LONG-TERM RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY [J].
CROCHET, DP ;
STORA, O ;
FERRY, D ;
GROSSETETE, R ;
LEURENT, B ;
BRUNEL, P ;
NGUYEN, JM .
RADIOLOGY, 1993, 188 (03) :857-860
[5]   Eight-year follow-up of patients with permanent vena cava filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism - The PREPIC (Prevention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave) randomized study [J].
Decousus, H ;
Barral, FG ;
Buchmuller-Cordier, A ;
Charbonnier, B ;
Girard, P ;
Lamer, C ;
Laporte, A ;
Leizorovicz, A ;
Mismetti, P ;
Parent, F ;
Quenet, S ;
Rivron-Guillot, K ;
Tardy, B .
CIRCULATION, 2005, 112 (03) :416-422
[7]   A comparison of low-dose heparin with low-molecular-weight heparin as prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism after major trauma [J].
Geerts, WH ;
Jay, RM ;
Code, KI ;
Chen, EL ;
Szalai, JP ;
Saibil, EA ;
Hamilton, PA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (10) :701-707
[8]   Experience with the recovery filter as a retrievable inferior vena cava filter [J].
Grande, WJ ;
Trerotola, SO ;
Reilly, PM ;
Clark, TWI ;
Soulen, MC ;
Patel, A ;
Shlansky-Goldberg, RD ;
Tuite, CM ;
Solomon, JA ;
Mondschein, JI ;
Fitzpatrick, MK ;
Stavropoulos, SW .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2005, 16 (09) :1189-1193
[9]   Recommended reporting standards for vena caval filter placement and patient follow-up [J].
Greenfield, LJ ;
Rutherford, RB .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 10 (08) :1013-1019
[10]   Recovery™ vena cava filter:: Experience in 96 patients [J].
Kalva, SP ;
Athanasoulis, CA ;
Fan, CM ;
Curvelo, M ;
Geller, SC ;
Greenfield, AJ ;
Waltman, AC ;
Wicky, S .
CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2006, 29 (04) :559-564