Applications of the Repeatability of Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers: A Review of Statistical Analysis of Repeat Data Sets

被引:130
作者
Barnhart, Huiman X. [2 ]
Barboriak, Daniel P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Durham, NC 27710 USA
来源
TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY | 2009年 / 2卷 / 04期
关键词
ASSESSING AGREEMENT; DRUG DEVELOPMENT; CANCER; SPECTROSCOPY; SOFTWARE; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1593/tlo.09268
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Repeat imaging data sets performed on patients with cancer are becoming publicly available. The potential utility of these data sets for addressing important questions in imaging biomarker development is vast. In particular, these data sets may be useful to help characterize the variability of quantitative parameters derived from imaging. This article reviews statistical analysis that may be performed to use results of repeat imaging to 1) calculate the level of change in parameter value that may be seen in individual patients to confidently characterize that patient as showing true parameter change, 2) calculate the level of change in parameters value that may be seen in individual patients to confidently categorize that patient as showing true lack of parameter change, 3) determine if different imaging devices are interchangeable from the standpoint of repeatability, and 4) estimate the numbers of patients needed to precisely calculate repeatability. In addition, we recommend a set of statistical parameters that should be reported when the repeatability of continuous parameters is studied.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 235
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, BIOMETRICS, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1541-0420.2008.01138_10.X
[2]   The Reference Image Database to Evaluate Response to therapy in lung cancer (RIDER) project: A resource for the development of change-analysis software [J].
Armato, S. G., III ;
Meyer, C. R. ;
McNitt-Gray, M. F. ;
McLennan, G. ;
Reeves, A. P. ;
Croft, B. Y. ;
Clarke, L. P. .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2008, 84 (04) :448-456
[3]   An overview on assessing agreement with continuous measurements [J].
Barnhart, Huiman X. ;
Haber, Michael J. ;
Lin, Lawrence I. .
JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2007, 17 (04) :529-569
[4]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[5]   Quantitative techniques in 18FDG PET scanning in oncology [J].
Castell, F. ;
Cook, G. J. R. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2008, 98 (10) :1597-1601
[6]   Quantitative tumor perfusion assessment with multidetector CT: Are measurements from two commercial software packages interchangeable? [J].
Goh, Vicky ;
Halligan, Steve ;
Bartram, Clive I. .
RADIOLOGY, 2007, 242 (03) :777-782
[7]   Reproducibility, repeatability, correlation and measurement error [J].
Halligan, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2002, 75 (890) :193-194
[8]   Comparison of 1.5T and 3T 1H MR spectroscopy for human brain tumors [J].
Kim, Ji-hoon ;
Chang, Kee-Hyun ;
Na, Dong Gyu ;
Song, In Chan ;
Kim, Seung Ja ;
Kwon, Bae Ju ;
Han, Moon Hee .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2006, 7 (03) :156-161
[9]   Imaging as a biomarker for therapy response: Cancer as a prototype for the creation of research resources [J].
McLennan, G. ;
Clarke, L. ;
Hohl, R. J. .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2008, 84 (04) :433-436
[10]  
Metz Charles E, 2006, J Am Coll Radiol, V3, P413, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.02.021