In vitro electrical properties for iridium oxide versus titanium nitride stimulating electrodes

被引:274
作者
Weiland, JD [1 ]
Anderson, DJ
Humayun, MS
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Doheny Retina Inst, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Biomed Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ So Calif, Dept Biomed Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
关键词
electrical stimulation; microelectrodes; neural prostheses;
D O I
10.1109/TBME.2002.805487
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Stimulating electrode materials must be capable of supplying high-density electrical charge to effectively activate neural tissue. Platinum is the most commonly used material for neural stimulation.. Two other materials have been considered: iridium oxide and titanium nitride. This study directly compared the electrical characteristics of iridium oxide and titanium nitride by fabricating silicon substrate probes that differed only in the material used to form the electrode. Electrochemical measurements indicated that iridium oxide had lower impedance and a higher charge storage capacity than titanium nitride, suggesting better performance as a stimulating electrode. Direct measurement of the electrode potential in response to a biphasic current pulse confirmed that iridium oxide uses less voltage to transfer the same amount of charge, therefore using less power. The charge injection limit for titanium nitride was 0.87 mC/cm(2), contradicting other reports estimating that titanium nitride was capable of injecting 22 mC/cm(2). Iridium oxide charge storage was 4 mC/cm(2), which is comparable to other published values for iridium oxide. Electrode efficiency will lead to an overall more efficient and effective device.
引用
收藏
页码:1574 / 1579
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, P 18 ANN INT C IEEE
[2]   CHARGE INJECTION LIMITS OF ACTIVATED IRIDIUM OXIDE ELECTRODES WITH 0.2MS PULSES IN BICARBONATE BUFFERED SALINE [J].
BEEBE, X ;
ROSE, TL .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1988, 35 (06) :494-495
[3]   CRITERIA FOR SELECTING ELECTRODES FOR ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION - THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BRUMMER, SB ;
ROBBLEE, LS ;
HAMBRECHT, FT .
ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1983, 405 (JUN) :159-171
[4]   The subretinal microphotodiode array retinal prosthesis [J].
Chow, AY ;
Peachey, NS .
OPHTHALMIC RESEARCH, 1998, 30 (03) :195-196
[6]   Learning retina implants with epiretinal contacts [J].
Eckmiller, R .
OPHTHALMIC RESEARCH, 1997, 29 (05) :281-289
[7]   Neuroprosthetic applications of electrical stimulation [J].
Grill, WM ;
Kirsch, RF .
ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 12 (01) :6-20
[8]   Long-term survival of retinal cell cultures on retinal implant materials [J].
Guenther, E ;
Tröger, B ;
Schlosshauer, B ;
Zrenner, E .
VISION RESEARCH, 1999, 39 (24) :3988-3994
[9]   Pattern electrical stimulation of the human retina [J].
Humayun, MS ;
de Juan, E ;
Weiland, JD ;
Dagnelie, G ;
Katona, S ;
Greenberg, R ;
Suzuki, S .
VISION RESEARCH, 1999, 39 (15) :2569-2576
[10]   High-frequency unilateral thalamic stimulation in the treatment of essential and parkinsonian tremor [J].
Koller, W ;
Pahwa, R ;
Busenbark, K ;
Hubble, J ;
Wilkinson, S ;
Lang, A ;
Tuite, P ;
Sime, E ;
Lazano, A ;
Hauser, R ;
Malapira, T ;
Smith, D ;
Tarsy, D ;
Miyawaki, E ;
Norregaard, T ;
Kormos, T ;
Olanow, CW .
ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1997, 42 (03) :292-299