Carbon isotope discrimination of arctic and boreal biomes inferred from remote atmospheric measurements and a biosphere-atmosphere model -: art. no. 1028

被引:42
作者
Randerson, JT
Still, CJ
Ballé, JJ
Fung, IY
Doney, SC
Tans, PP
Conway, TJ
White, JWC
Vaughn, B
Suits, N
Denning, AS
机构
[1] CALTECH, Div Geol & Planetary Sci, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[2] CALTECH, Div Engn & Appl Sci, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Ctr Atmospher Sci, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[4] NOAA, Climat Monitoring & Diagnost Lab, Boulder, CO 80305 USA
[5] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
[6] Univ Colorado, Inst Arctic & Alpine Res, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[7] Colorado State Univ, Dept Atmospher Sci, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
net primary production; light use efficiency; carbon isotope discrimination; temperature sensitivity of respiration; seasonal cycle of CO2; Q10 respiration factor;
D O I
10.1029/2001GB001435
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
[1] Estimating discrimination against C-13 during photosynthesis at landscape, regional, and biome scales is difficult because of large-scale variability in plant stress, vegetation composition, and photosynthetic pathway. Here we present estimates of C-13 discrimination for northern biomes based on a biosphere-atmosphere model and on National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory and Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research remote flask measurements. With our inversion approach, we solved for three ecophysiological parameters of the northern biosphere (delta(13)C discrimination, a net primary production light use efficiency, and a temperature sensitivity of heterotrophic respiration (a Q10 factor)) that provided a best fit between modeled and observed delta(13)C and CO2. In our analysis we attempted to explicitly correct for fossil fuel emissions, remote C4 ecosystem fluxes, ocean exchange, and isotopic disequilibria of terrestrial heterotrophic respiration caused by the Suess effect. We obtained a photosynthetic discrimination for arctic and boreal biomes between 19.0 and 19.6%. Our inversion analysis suggests that Q10 and light use efficiency values that minimize the cost function covary. The optimal light use efficiency was 0.47 gC MJ(-1) photosynthetically active radiation, and the optimal Q10 value was 1.52. Fossil fuel and ocean exchange contributed proportionally more to month-to-month changes in the atmospheric growth rate of delta(13)C and CO2 during winter months, suggesting that remote atmospheric observations during the summer may yield more precise estimates of the isotopic composition of the biosphere.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 82 条
[31]   Carbon 13 exchanges between the atmosphere and biosphere [J].
Fung, I ;
Field, CB ;
Berry, JA ;
Thompson, MV ;
Randerson, JT ;
Malmstrom, CM ;
Vitousek, PM ;
Collatz, GJ ;
Sellers, PJ ;
Randall, DA ;
Denning, AS ;
Badeck, F ;
John, J .
GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 1997, 11 (04) :507-533
[32]   3-DIMENSIONAL MODEL SYNTHESIS OF THE GLOBAL METHANE CYCLE [J].
FUNG, I ;
JOHN, J ;
LERNER, J ;
MATTHEWS, E ;
PRATHER, M ;
STEELE, LP ;
FRASER, PJ .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1991, 96 (D7) :13033-13065
[33]   Direct and indirect estimation of leaf area index, fAPAR, and net primary production of terrestrial ecosystems [J].
Gower, ST ;
Kucharik, CJ ;
Norman, JM .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 70 (01) :29-51
[34]   Spatiotemporal patterns of carbon-13 in the global surface oceans and the oceanic Suess effect [J].
Gruber, N ;
Keeling, CD ;
Bacastow, RB ;
Guenther, PR ;
Lueker, TJ ;
Wahlen, M ;
Meijer, HAJ ;
Mook, WG ;
Stocker, TF .
GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 1999, 13 (02) :307-335
[35]   An improved estimate of the isotopic air-sea disequilibrium of CO2:: Implications for the oceanic uptake of anthropogenic CO2 [J].
Gruber, N ;
Keeling, CD .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2001, 28 (03) :555-558
[36]   FACTORS CONTROLLING C-13 CONTENTS OF SEDIMENTARY ORGANIC-COMPOUNDS - PRINCIPLES AND EVIDENCE [J].
HAYES, JM .
MARINE GEOLOGY, 1993, 113 (1-2) :111-125
[37]   Evaluation of terrestrial Carbon Cycle models through simulations of the seasonal cycle of atmospheric CO2:: First results of a model intercomparison study [J].
Heimann, M ;
Esser, G ;
Haxeltine, A ;
Kaduk, J ;
Kicklighter, DW ;
Knorr, W ;
Kohlmaier, GH ;
McGuire, AD ;
Melillo, J ;
Moore, B ;
Otto, RD ;
Prentice, IC ;
Sauf, W ;
Schloss, A ;
Sitch, S ;
Wittenberg, U ;
Wurth, G .
GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 1998, 12 (01) :1-24
[38]  
KAMINSKI T, 2002, IN PRESS GLOBAL BIOG, V16
[39]  
Kaminski T., 1996, Phys. Chem. Earth, V21, P457, DOI [10.1016/S0079-1946(97)81142-1, DOI 10.1016/S0079-1946(97)81142-1]